H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Tim Henman vs Taylor Dent H2H: 1-0

Tim Henman holds a 1–0 lead over Taylor Dent in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tim Henman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2005 Madrid Open round of 64 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Taylor Dent
USA Age 45 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tim Henman #26 6-2 6-4 Taylor Dent #28 Match data Oct 19, 2005* R64 Madrid Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,026 469 263 64.1% 0 1 0 1 9 11
Taylor Dent #979 #21 1,345 1,910 152 140 52.1% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tim Henman Taylor Dent
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1998 1–3 25.0% #410 1,493 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1999 0–2 0.0% #276 1,464 0 0
19 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0 2000 3–7 30.0% #181 1,529 0 0
20 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,571 0 0 2001 10–13 43.5% #124 1,628 0 0
21 1996 38–25 60.3% #29 1,811 0 0 2002 20–17 54.1% #57 1,688 0 1
22 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2 2003 28–12 70.0% #33 1,889 0 4
23 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4 2004 32–25 56.1% #32 1,759 0 4
24 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,786 0 4 2005 33–21 61.1% #29 1,786 0 4
25 2000 55–24 69.6% #10 1,939 0 6 2006 1–4 20.0% #574 1,715 0 4
26 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,922 0 8 — — — — — — —
27 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,888 0 9 2008 0–2 0.0% #865 1,673 0 4
28 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,971 0 11 2009 12–15 44.4% #76 1,731 0 4
29 2004 41–21 66.1% #6 1,914 0 11 2010 12–19 38.7% #118 1,777 0 4
30 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11 — — — — — — —
31 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,867 0 11 — — — — — — —
32 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,683 0 11 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tim Henman Taylor Dent
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1994 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2000 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2001 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
21 1996 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 17 9 26 65.4% 2002 13 13 26 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
22 1997 27 11 38 71.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 11 6 17 64.7% 2003 18 5 23 78.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 0 5 100.0%
23 1998 40 18 58 69.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 4 9 55.6% 2004 25 16 41 61.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1999 16 14 30 53.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 9 4 13 69.2% 2005 24 15 39 61.5% — — — — 8 4 12 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 2000 41 14 55 74.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2006 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2001 28 12 40 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2002 27 10 37 73.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2003 10 9 19 52.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 8 1 9 88.9% 2009 10 12 22 45.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 2004 23 13 36 63.9% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2010 10 14 24 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
30 2005 15 11 26 57.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 19 13 32 59.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 266 147 413 64.4% 56 46 102 54.9% 78 34 112 69.6% 69 36 105 65.7% — 113 101 214 52.8% 4 12 16 25.0% 29 23 52 55.8% 6 4 10 60.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 644/732 of Tim Henman's and 277/292 of Taylor Dent's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tim Henman Taylor Dent
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 4/4 5.8 5.5 51.6% 71.1% 47.8% 52.0% 15.8% 60.1% 32.5%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 2/2 4.5 4.0 52.4% 58.4% 52.8% 38.6% 50.0% 55.6% 16.3%
19 1994 5/8 3.0 2.6 62.7% 65.7% 41.8% 48.7% 36.9% 56.9% 33.4% 2000 9/10 7.7 5.7 55.0% 73.1% 47.0% 59.7% 32.1% 61.8% 32.4%
20 1995 11/14 3.7 5.0 55.9% 69.5% 47.7% 53.7% 54.6% 60.1% 34.7% 2001 22/23 7.2 5.5 53.3% 77.2% 48.9% 52.3% 35.8% 63.6% 37.4%
21 1996 50/63 7.1 3.7 56.7% 73.9% 51.4% 58.8% 39.0% 64.4% 36.7% 2002 31/37 7.0 4.4 59.7% 72.5% 53.0% 54.4% 47.5% 64.5% 38.6%
22 1997 63/70 8.3 4.8 51.2% 80.7% 50.4% 61.5% 38.9% 65.8% 38.3% 2003 39/40 8.5 6.3 55.1% 78.7% 52.1% 64.4% 46.6% 66.7% 40.0%
23 1998 71/84 7.2 4.1 52.9% 77.8% 50.0% 54.0% 45.5% 64.6% 39.3% 2004 51/57 6.4 5.7 59.9% 73.2% 49.5% 60.1% 47.7% 63.7% 37.7%
24 1999 57/66 7.0 3.8 54.9% 76.7% 50.5% 62.0% 41.3% 64.8% 40.2% 2005 54/54 8.1 6.6 54.3% 78.7% 49.9% 60.4% 40.5% 65.7% 38.2%
25 2000 62/79 7.0 4.1 55.2% 77.1% 50.9% 68.9% 40.4% 65.4% 41.2% 2006 5/5 7.8 5.0 59.6% 76.5% 44.0% 50.7% 37.9% 63.6% 32.9%
26 2001 58/69 4.7 3.1 60.9% 74.3% 53.1% 61.1% 47.4% 66.2% 42.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2002 54/63 3.4 2.2 64.4% 70.8% 52.9% 63.3% 45.7% 64.3% 40.8% 2008 2/2 6.0 7.5 60.2% 69.7% 44.4% 39.8% 51.1% 59.6% 35.2%
28 2003 45/46 4.8 3.7 58.8% 72.7% 51.8% 59.3% 47.9% 64.1% 39.5% 2009 27/27 7.9 5.9 58.3% 77.2% 46.3% 56.8% 43.8% 64.1% 34.7%
29 2004 60/62 6.1 4.1 58.7% 74.2% 55.5% 59.4% 49.0% 66.6% 39.1% 2010 31/31 7.8 5.9 56.0% 74.5% 46.9% 59.1% 42.8% 62.3% 34.6%
30 2005 41/41 4.4 3.3 61.9% 73.8% 52.4% 62.5% 45.6% 65.7% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 51/51 4.7 2.3 61.5% 71.5% 51.9% 59.0% 48.7% 63.8% 38.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 16/16 7.6 4.3 62.5% 69.6% 51.9% 65.9% 40.5% 62.9% 34.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 644/732 6.0 3.7 57.7% 74.8% 51.7% 60.7% 44.4% 64.9% 39.4% — 277/292 7.5 5.8 56.6% 75.7% 49.5% 58.5% 43.1% 64.3% 37.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tim Henman Taylor Dent
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1493 99.7 -1.26 -1.61 0.814 45.7% +33 — — 12.5% -2.75 0–1 1–1 — +0.32
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1465 96.9 -3.78 -2.62 0.368 39.5% — — — 0.0% -3.20 — — — +0.21
19 1994 1513 116.8 -1.59 -1.36 0.776 45.4% +47 — +42 40.0% -1.00 1–1 2–0 — -0.33 2000 1529 121.3 +0.19 -0.70 0.847 47.1% -45 — — 30.0% -0.75 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) — -0.36
20 1995 1572 115.6 -2.09 -1.97 0.869 47.8% 0 — +26 45.7% -0.43 2–1 (67%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.04 2001 1629 135.5 +1.76 +1.11 1.026 50.3% -54 — +38 47.4% -0.09 2–4 (33%) 6–5 (55%) — -0.88
21 1996 1811 143.5 +1.77 -0.36 1.030 50.5% -28 — -52 58.2% +0.39 8–11 (42%) 24–14 (63%) — -0.81 2002 1689 132.9 +1.18 +0.85 1.087 51.5% -39 — +71 56.8% +0.38 3–7 (30%) 9–8 (53%) — +2.03
22 1997 1896 147.8 +3.33 +0.92 1.120 51.9% 0 -414 -26 59.7% +0.52 17–9 (65%) 18–11 (62%) — +0.85 2003 1889 141.1 +3.77 +2.59 1.202 53.1% +34 -446 -112 68.5% +0.98 4–3 (57%) 15–8 (65%) — -0.53
23 1998 1961 159.5 +2.85 +2.23 1.107 52.0% -1 -493 +17 61.8% +0.65 17–12 (59%) 16–10 (62%) — -1.62 2004 1759 136.0 +0.62 +1.01 1.040 50.8% +38 -302 +19 53.7% +0.19 9–7 (56%) 12–13 (48%) — +1.76
24 1999 1787 151.2 +2.50 +2.30 1.142 52.1% -11 -152 +243 58.8% +0.71 13–13 (50%) 14–16 (47%) — +0.72 2005 1786 148.2 +2.55 +1.76 1.112 51.9% +20 — +62 61.1% +0.69 7–6 (54%) 14–9 (61%) — +0.10
25 2000 1939 155.2 +3.31 +3.56 1.191 53.1% +29 -234 +63 66.7% +1.07 11–12 (48%) 17–10 (63%) — +0.25 2006 1715 112.2 +0.47 -2.19 0.903 47.7% 0 — — 36.4% -0.55 0–2 0–3 (0%) — -0.05
26 2001 1922 152.8 +3.40 +4.67 1.266 54.3% -2 -179 +132 67.0% +1.29 11–12 (48%) 17–14 (55%) — +2.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2002 1888 153.2 +2.14 +3.42 1.145 52.4% +19 -133 +186 66.3% +1.06 14–8 (64%) 9–15 (38%) — +0.21 2008 1673 99.9 -1.58 -0.41 0.872 47.8% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–2 0–1 — +0.27
28 2003 1972 147.0 +1.73 +3.09 1.100 51.8% -9 -200 +151 60.0% +0.66 8–2 (80%) 10–8 (56%) — -2.72 2009 1731 134.4 -0.29 -1.60 0.968 49.6% +28 — +79 45.8% -0.22 4–5 (44%) 8–4 (67%) — +1.07
29 2004 1914 154.9 +3.57 +2.65 1.174 52.8% +17 -34 +142 60.8% +0.86 11–7 (61%) 12–18 (40%) — +0.11 2010 1777 141.2 -0.60 -0.78 0.919 48.7% +7 -290 +11 42.3% -0.45 4–7 (36%) 6–5 (55%) — -1.86
30 2005 1746 146.2 +2.43 +1.53 1.114 51.8% +62 +91 +293 55.6% +0.50 6–8 (43%) 6–8 (43%) — +0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 1868 152.1 +1.77 +2.07 1.076 51.4% -18 -56 +205 59.5% +0.54 5–8 (38%) 10–7 (59%) — -2.94 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 1684 119.8 -0.80 -0.33 0.931 49.2% +55 +34 +277 40.0% -0.34 1–8 (11%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2026 155.9 +2.48 +2.23 1.121 52.1% +5 -155 +114 60.6% +0.70 125–112 (53%) 161–141 (53%) 96.1 -0.44 — 1911 143.3 +1.28 +0.73 1.037 50.7% +9 -344 +24 52.8% +0.16 34–46 (43%) 71–61 (54%) 97.1 +0.72

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.