H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC

Tim Henman vs Thomas Johansson H2H: 6-2

Tim Henman holds a 6–2 lead over Thomas Johansson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 4–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2006 Rome Masters third round 7-6(8) 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
6 – 2
8 main draw meetings
Thomas Johansson
SWE Age 51 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 11, 2006* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Tim Henman #70 7-6(8) 6-1 Thomas Johansson #14 Match data
Feb 23, 2006* Rotterdam ATP 250 R32 Hard Tim Henman #40 6-4 6-4 Thomas Johansson #13 Match data
Jun 11, 2005* Queen's Club ATP 250 QF Grass Thomas Johansson #20 6-4 6-4 Tim Henman #9 Match data
Apr 21, 2002* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 QF Clay Tim Henman #5 2-6 6-4 7-6(4) Thomas Johansson #9 Match data
Mar 2, 2002* Dubai ATP 250 QF Hard Thomas Johansson #10 6-4 6-3 Tim Henman #11 Match data
Jan 6, 2001* Adelaide ATP 250 QF Hard Tim Henman #10 7-6(2) 6-7(4) 6-3 Thomas Johansson #39 Match data
Oct 10, 1998* Basel ATP 250 SF Hard Tim Henman #11 6-3 2-6 7-6(5) Thomas Johansson #22 Match data
Apr 26, 1996* Seoul ATP 250 R16 Hard Tim Henman #60 6-3 7-5 Thomas Johansson #98 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,027 468 260 64.3% 0 1 0 0 10 11
Thomas Johansson #586 #7 2,365 1,969 336 277 54.8% 1 1 0 0 7 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tim Henman Thomas Johansson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1993 2–1 66.7% #422 1,535 0 0
19 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0 1994 0–2 0.0% #486 1,496 0 0
20 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,584 0 0 1995 1–3 25.0% #117 1,492 0 0
21 1996 37–24 60.7% #29 1,821 0 0 1996 28–21 57.1% #60 1,763 0 0
22 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2 1997 32–27 54.2% #39 1,699 0 2
23 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4 1998 46–30 60.5% #17 1,899 0 2
24 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,785 0 4 1999 21–23 47.7% #39 1,725 0 3
25 2000 55–23 70.5% #10 1,953 0 6 2000 22–25 46.8% #39 1,825 0 4
26 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,924 0 8 2001 42–23 64.6% #18 1,875 0 6
27 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,867 0 9 2002 26–22 54.2% #14 1,746 1 7
28 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,970 0 11 — — — — — — —
29 2004 41–20 67.2% #6 1,926 0 11 2004 29–20 59.2% #30 1,855 1 8
30 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11 2005 42–24 63.6% #13 1,892 1 9
31 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,868 0 11 2006 11–16 40.7% #71 1,723 1 9
32 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,684 0 11 2007 23–23 50.0% #62 1,759 1 9
33 — — — — — — — 2008 11–17 39.3% #136 1,673 1 9