H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Tim Henman vs Todd Martin H2H: 4-3

Tim Henman holds a 4–3 lead over Todd Martin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Todd Martin leads 2–1 on grass, while Tim Henman leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2003 Roland Garros second round 7-6(5) 5-7 6-1 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4 – 3
7 main draw meetings
Todd Martin
USA Age 56 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 30, 2003* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Tim Henman #28 7-6(5) 5-7 6-1 7-5 Todd Martin #94 Match data
Mar 17, 2002* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 SF Hard Tim Henman #11 6-3 6-3 Todd Martin #64 Match data
Jul 4, 2001* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Tim Henman #11 6-7(3) 7-6(5) 4-6 6-3 6-2 Todd Martin #34 Match data
Nov 14, 1998* Stockholm ATP 250 SF Hard Todd Martin #21 4-6 6-1 6-2 Tim Henman #10 Match data
Sep 1, 1996* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Tim Henman #39 6-2 7-6(4) 6-4 Todd Martin #13 Match data
Jul 5, 1996* Wimbledon Grand Slam QF Grass Todd Martin #18 7-6(5) 7-6(2) 6-4 Tim Henman #62 Match data
Jun 9, 1994* Queen's Club ATP 250 R32 Grass Todd Martin #9 6-4 6-4 Tim Henman #161 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,027 468 260 64.3% 0 1 0 0 10 11
Todd Martin #145 #4 2,969 2,063 398 222 64.2% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tim Henman Todd Martin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0 1990 3–4 42.9% #269 1,508 0 0
20 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,584 0 0 1991 10–8 55.6% #134 1,648 0 0
21 1996 37–24 60.7% #29 1,821 0 0 1992 22–19 53.7% #87 1,724 0 0
22 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2 1993 45–23 66.2% #13 1,886 0 1
23 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4 1994 50–19 72.5% #10 1,943 0 3
24 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,785 0 4 1995 45–21 68.2% #18 1,912 0 4
25 2000 55–23 70.5% #10 1,953 0 6 1996 49–20 71.0% #12 1,926 0 5
26 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,924 0 8 1997 13–7 65.0% #81 1,914 0 5
27 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,867 0 9 1998 43–20 68.3% #16 1,998 0 7
28 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,970 0 11 1999 42–17 71.2% #7 1,914 0 8
29 2004 41–20 67.2% #6 1,926 0 11 2000 14–11 56.0% #55 1,887 0 8
30 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11 2001 13–11 54.2% #57 1,823 0 8
31 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,868 0 11 2002 24–16 60.0% #47 1,788 0 8
32 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,684 0 11 2003 15–11 57.7% #68 1,828 0 8
33 — — — — — — — 2004 10–15 40.0% #145 1,684 0 8