H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Tim Henman vs Tomas Zib H2H: 2-1

Tim Henman holds a 2–1 lead over Tomas Zib in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tomas Zib won the 2004 Dubai Tennis Championships round of 32 6-4 3-6 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Tomas Zib
CZE Age 50 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tomas Zib #149 6-4 3-6 7-6(4) Tim Henman #11 Match data Mar 4, 2004* R32 Dubai Tennis Championships International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Tim Henman #32 6-3 6-4 Tomas Zib #158 Match data Oct 24, 2003* R16 Swiss Indoors ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Tim Henman #29 6-2 7-6(11) 3-6 6-1 Tomas Zib #154 Match data Jun 25, 2003* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,026 469 263 64.1% 0 1 0 1 9 11
Tomas Zib #1,339 #51 688 1,637 41 94 30.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tim Henman Tomas Zib
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,571 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1996 38–25 60.3% #29 1,811 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2 1998 0–1 0.0% #172 1,487 0 0
23 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4 1999 4–4 50.0% #111 1,531 0 0
24 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,786 0 4 2000 5–13 27.8% #117 1,465 0 0
25 2000 55–24 69.6% #10 1,939 0 6 2001 3–11 21.4% #224 1,438 0 0
26 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,922 0 8 — — — — — — —
27 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,888 0 9 2003 1–5 16.7% #145 1,467 0 0
28 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,971 0 11 2004 3–8 27.3% #121 1,482 0 0
29 2004 41–21 66.1% #6 1,914 0 11 2005 18–27 40.0% #59 1,558 0 0
30 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11 2006 4–20 16.7% #133 1,509 0 0
31 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,867 0 11 2007 3–4 42.9% #138 1,535 0 0
32 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,683 0 11 2008 0–1 0.0% #416 1,545 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tim Henman Tomas Zib
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1994 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1996 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 17 9 26 65.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1997 27 11 38 71.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 11 6 17 64.7% 1998 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1998 40 18 58 69.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 4 9 55.6% 1999 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
24 1999 16 14 30 53.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 9 4 13 69.2% 2000 2 4 6 33.3% 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2000 41 14 55 74.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2001 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
26 2001 28 12 40 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2002 27 10 37 73.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
28 2003 10 9 19 52.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 8 1 9 88.9% 2004 2 4 6 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2004 23 13 36 63.9% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2005 8 13 21 38.1% 7 10 17 41.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2005 15 11 26 57.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 1 9 10 10.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
31 2006 19 13 32 59.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 2007 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 2007 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 266 147 413 64.4% 56 46 102 54.9% 78 34 112 69.6% 69 36 105 65.7% — 20 42 62 32.3% 14 36 50 28.0% 6 10 16 37.5% 1 6 7 14.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 644/732 of Tim Henman's and 123/134 of Tomas Zib's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tim Henman Tomas Zib
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 1994 5/8 3.0 2.6 62.7% 65.7% 41.8% 48.7% 36.9% 56.9% 33.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1995 11/14 3.7 5.0 55.9% 69.5% 47.7% 53.7% 54.6% 60.1% 34.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1996 50/63 7.1 3.7 56.7% 73.9% 51.4% 58.8% 39.0% 64.4% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1997 63/70 8.3 4.8 51.2% 80.7% 50.4% 61.5% 38.9% 65.8% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1998 71/84 7.2 4.1 52.9% 77.8% 50.0% 54.0% 45.5% 64.6% 39.3% 1999 6/8 5.3 2.3 64.3% 66.8% 49.9% 66.8% 48.2% 61.0% 40.5%
24 1999 57/66 7.0 3.8 54.9% 76.7% 50.5% 62.0% 41.3% 64.8% 40.2% 2000 12/18 2.4 1.9 61.0% 63.4% 47.2% 58.4% 41.1% 57.0% 37.4%
25 2000 62/79 7.0 4.1 55.2% 77.1% 50.9% 68.9% 40.4% 65.4% 41.2% 2001 12/14 3.0 1.4 63.1% 65.7% 43.7% 41.2% 47.7% 57.7% 33.8%
26 2001 58/69 4.7 3.1 60.9% 74.3% 53.1% 61.1% 47.4% 66.2% 42.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2002 54/63 3.4 2.2 64.4% 70.8% 52.9% 63.3% 45.7% 64.3% 40.8% 2003 6/6 2.3 2.0 57.8% 64.6% 50.3% 49.9% 22.2% 58.6% 27.5%
28 2003 45/46 4.8 3.7 58.8% 72.7% 51.8% 59.3% 47.9% 64.1% 39.5% 2004 11/11 3.8 2.1 56.9% 73.1% 55.6% 36.2% 24.5% 65.3% 34.6%
29 2004 60/62 6.1 4.1 58.7% 74.2% 55.5% 59.4% 49.0% 66.6% 39.1% 2005 44/45 3.7 1.9 57.7% 68.3% 50.5% 54.5% 43.5% 60.8% 34.9%
30 2005 41/41 4.4 3.3 61.9% 73.8% 52.4% 62.5% 45.6% 65.7% 38.2% 2006 24/24 4.3 2.1 56.5% 65.2% 48.6% 51.0% 32.7% 57.8% 31.1%
31 2006 51/51 4.7 2.3 61.5% 71.5% 51.9% 59.0% 48.7% 63.8% 38.9% 2007 7/7 3.4 1.7 59.2% 72.8% 47.8% 58.1% 55.7% 62.3% 31.8%
32 2007 16/16 7.6 4.3 62.5% 69.6% 51.9% 65.9% 40.5% 62.9% 34.5% 2008 1/1 12.0 5.0 62.6% 63.6% 51.9% 76.9% 31.6% 59.2% 37.3%
Career — 644/732 6.0 3.7 57.7% 74.8% 51.7% 60.7% 44.4% 64.9% 39.4% — 123/135 3.7 1.9 58.7% 67.4% 49.4% 52.0% 39.7% 59.9% 34.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tim Henman Tomas Zib
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1994 1513 116.8 -1.59 -1.36 0.776 45.4% +47 — +42 40.0% -1.00 1–1 2–0 — -0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1995 1572 115.6 -2.09 -1.97 0.869 47.8% 0 — +26 45.7% -0.43 2–1 (67%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1996 1811 143.5 +1.77 -0.36 1.030 50.5% -28 — -52 58.2% +0.39 8–11 (42%) 24–14 (63%) — -0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1997 1896 147.8 +3.33 +0.92 1.120 51.9% 0 -414 -26 59.7% +0.52 17–9 (65%) 18–11 (62%) — +0.85 1998 1488 — — — — — — — — — — — — — +0.05
23 1998 1961 159.5 +2.85 +2.23 1.107 52.0% -1 -493 +17 61.8% +0.65 17–12 (59%) 16–10 (62%) — -1.62 1999 1532 114.4 -0.88 +1.34 1.036 50.8% +42 -22 — 50.0% -0.25 1–3 (25%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.15
24 1999 1787 151.2 +2.50 +2.30 1.142 52.1% -11 -152 +243 58.8% +0.71 13–13 (50%) 14–16 (47%) — +0.72 2000 1466 109.0 -2.45 -1.12 0.869 47.6% +77 +6 — 30.2% -1.12 1–2 (33%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.93
25 2000 1939 155.2 +3.31 +3.56 1.191 53.1% +29 -234 +63 66.7% +1.07 11–12 (48%) 17–10 (63%) — +0.25 2001 1438 104.1 -3.27 -2.71 0.797 46.2% +74 -29 +70 26.7% -1.27 0–2 0–4 (0%) — +0.84
26 2001 1922 152.8 +3.40 +4.67 1.266 54.3% -2 -179 +132 67.0% +1.29 11–12 (48%) 17–14 (55%) — +2.30 2002 1446 99.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2002 1888 153.2 +2.14 +3.42 1.145 52.4% +19 -133 +186 66.3% +1.06 14–8 (64%) 9–15 (38%) — +0.21 2003 1467 112.3 -1.03 -2.85 0.665 43.6% +18 — — 21.4% -2.14 — 2–1 (67%) — -0.14
28 2003 1972 147.0 +1.73 +3.09 1.100 51.8% -9 -200 +151 60.0% +0.66 8–2 (80%) 10–8 (56%) — -2.72 2004 1483 116.6 +0.88 -0.84 0.995 48.9% +57 -63 — 37.9% -0.52 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.23
29 2004 1914 154.9 +3.57 +2.65 1.174 52.8% +17 -34 +142 60.8% +0.86 11–7 (61%) 12–18 (40%) — +0.11 2005 1559 125.5 -1.66 -2.16 0.889 48.0% -7 -52 -39 39.4% -0.58 5–4 (56%) 6–10 (38%) — +0.40
30 2005 1746 146.2 +2.43 +1.53 1.114 51.8% +62 +91 +293 55.6% +0.50 6–8 (43%) 6–8 (43%) — +0.77 2006 1510 117.1 -2.65 -3.89 0.738 44.8% -21 -33 +10 23.2% -1.89 0–4 (0%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.86
31 2006 1868 152.1 +1.77 +2.07 1.076 51.4% -18 -56 +205 59.5% +0.54 5–8 (38%) 10–7 (59%) — -2.94 2007 1536 109.9 -0.29 -0.67 0.843 47.8% -52 — — 38.9% -0.50 1–0 2–1 (67%) — -0.21
32 2007 1684 119.8 -0.80 -0.33 0.931 49.2% +55 +34 +277 40.0% -0.34 1–8 (11%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.06 2008 1546 108.9 -2.23 -0.51 0.914 49.3% — — — 40.0% 0.00 0–1 1–1 — +0.06
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1544 102.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2026 155.9 +2.48 +2.23 1.121 52.1% +5 -155 +114 60.6% +0.70 125–112 (53%) 161–141 (53%) 96.1 -0.44 — 1637 118.7 -1.72 -2.10 0.848 47.2% +15 -33 +1 33.9% -0.98 9–20 (31%) 21–28 (43%) 92.8 +0.73

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.