H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Tim Henman vs Vincent Spadea H2H: 3-0

Tim Henman holds a 3–0 lead over Vincent Spadea in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2004 Monte Carlo Masters second round 6-7(5) 6-4 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Vincent Spadea
USA Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 21, 2004* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Tim Henman #7 6-7(5) 6-4 7-6(5) Vincent Spadea #31 Match data
May 31, 2000* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Tim Henman #13 7-5 7-5 6-4 Vincent Spadea #50 Match data
Sep 13, 1997* Tashkent ATP 250 QF Hard Tim Henman #20 6-3 6-4 Vincent Spadea #114 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,027 468 260 64.3% 0 1 0 0 10 11
Vincent Spadea #1,474 #18 1,629 1,876 310 348 47.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Tim Henman Vincent Spadea
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0 1993 1–5 16.7% #303 1,483 0 0
1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,584 0 0 1994 11–13 45.8% #75 1,561 0 0
1996 37–24 60.7% #29 1,821 0 0 1995 21–28 42.9% #81 1,639 0 0
1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2 1996 27–22 55.1% #54 1,711 0 0
1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4 1997 20–26 43.5% #88 1,695 0 0
1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,785 0 4 1998 28–27 50.9% #42 1,752 0 0
2000 55–23 70.5% #10 1,953 0 6 1999 33–27 55.0% #20 1,763 0 0
2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,924 0 8 2000 3–23 11.5% #213 1,545 0 0
2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,867 0 9 2001 1–3 25.0% #125 1,534 0 0
2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,970 0 11 2002 13–17 43.3% #67 1,623 0 0
2004 41–20 67.2% #6 1,926 0 11 2003 34–25 57.6% #29 1,723 0 0
2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11 2004 39–25 60.9% #20 1,784 0 1
2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,868 0 11 2005 21–24 46.7% #75 1,665 0 1
2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,684 0 11 2006 19–26 42.2% #73 1,627 0 1
— — — — — — — 2007 24–28 46.2% #77 1,650 0 1
— — — — — — — 2008 13–19 40.6% #76 1,657 0 1
— — — — — — — 2009 2–9 18.2% #295 1,526 0 1
— — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #1517 1,480 0 1