H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 07:16 UTC
Tim Henman vs Vladimir Voltchkov H2H: 2-0
Tim Henman holds a 2–0 lead over Vladimir Voltchkov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2003 Roland Garros first round 6-2 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 51
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
BLR
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2003* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Tim Henman | 6-2 6-3 6-1 | Vladimir Voltchkov | Match data |
| Jan 18, 2002* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Tim Henman | 6-3 6-4 6-1 | Vladimir Voltchkov | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tim Henman | #615 | #4 | 2,826 | 2,027 | 468 | 260 | 64.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
| Vladimir Voltchkov | #1,605 | #25 | 1,108 | 1,784 | 50 | 68 | 42.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Tim Henman | Vladimir Voltchkov | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1994 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #167 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #668 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #277 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #162 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #17 | 1,895 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #174 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 55–29 | 65.5% | #7 | 1,960 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 13–7 | 65.0% | #46 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #12 | 1,785 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #99 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 55–23 | 70.5% | #10 | 1,953 | 0 | 6 | 2002 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #73 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #9 | 1,924 | 0 | 8 | 2003 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #120 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 45–18 | 71.4% | #8 | 1,867 | 0 | 9 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #192 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,970 | 0 | 11 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 41–20 | 67.2% | #6 | 1,926 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #39 | 1,868 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #292 | 1,684 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |