H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Tim Henman vs Wayne Arthurs H2H: 3-0
Tim Henman holds a 3–0 lead over Wayne Arthurs in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2004 Indian Wells Masters fourth round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 51
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 55
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2004* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Tim Henman | 6-1 6-3 | Wayne Arthurs | Match data |
| Jun 15, 2001* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Tim Henman | 6-7(5) 7-6(6) 7-6(4) | Wayne Arthurs | Match data |
| Jan 21, 2001* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Tim Henman | 6-3 6-2 0-6 6-2 | Wayne Arthurs | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tim Henman | #615 | #4 | 2,826 | 2,027 | 468 | 260 | 64.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
| Wayne Arthurs | #368 | #44 | 833 | 1,781 | 122 | 152 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tim Henman | Wayne Arthurs | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1994 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #167 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1995 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1996 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1997 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #17 | 1,895 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1998 | 55–29 | 65.5% | #7 | 1,960 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1999 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #12 | 1,785 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2000 | 55–23 | 70.5% | #10 | 1,953 | 0 | 6 | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #561 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #9 | 1,924 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2002 | 45–18 | 71.4% | #8 | 1,867 | 0 | 9 | 1998 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #187 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2003 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,970 | 0 | 11 | 1999 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #105 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2004 | 41–20 | 67.2% | #6 | 1,926 | 0 | 11 | 2000 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #83 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2005 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 11 | 2001 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #77 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2006 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #39 | 1,868 | 0 | 11 | 2002 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #52 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2007 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #292 | 1,684 | 0 | 11 | 2003 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #101 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #97 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #161 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #244 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |