H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Tim Mayotte vs Buster C Mottram H2H: 2-0
Tim Mayotte holds a 2–0 lead over Buster C Mottram in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tim Mayotte leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Tim Mayotte won the 1982 Wimbledon fourth round 6-2 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 65
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GBR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 1982* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Tim Mayotte | 6-2 7-5 6-3 | Buster C Mottram | Match data |
| Jun 17, 1981* | Bristol | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Tim Mayotte | 7-6 6-4 | Buster C Mottram | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tim Mayotte | #1,103 | #7 | 1,274 | 2,047 | 333 | 194 | 63.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 12 |
| Buster C Mottram | #735 | #15 | 0 | 1,952 | 270 | 177 | 60.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Tim Mayotte | Buster C Mottram | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1979 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #171 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #33 | 1,800 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #30 | 1,809 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #33 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #16 | 1,902 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #55 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #44 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #34 | 1,897 | 0 | 2 |
| 1985 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #12 | 1,919 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #41 | 1,852 | 0 | 3 |
| 1986 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #15 | 1,855 | 0 | 2 | 1977 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #20 | 1,909 | 0 | 3 |
| 1987 | 44–13 | 77.2% | #9 | 1,981 | 0 | 7 | 1978 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 3 |
| 1988 | 42–15 | 73.7% | #10 | 1,909 | 0 | 11 | 1979 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #32 | 1,873 | 0 | 3 |
| 1989 | 29–15 | 65.9% | #13 | 1,913 | 0 | 12 | 1980 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #43 | 1,824 | 0 | 3 |
| 1990 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #37 | 1,745 | 0 | 12 | 1981 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,773 | 0 | 3 |
| 1991 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #115 | 1,716 | 0 | 12 | 1982 | 28–16 | 63.6% | #20 | 1,840 | 0 | 3 |
| 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1097 | 1,698 | 0 | 12 | 1983 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #91 | 1,703 | 0 | 3 |