H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Tim Mayotte vs Francisco Gonzalez H2H: 2-1
Tim Mayotte holds a 2–1 lead over Francisco Gonzalez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tim Mayotte leads 2–0 on grass, while Francisco Gonzalez leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tim Mayotte won the 1984 Wimbledon second round 7-5 7-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 65
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
PAR
Age 70
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 1984* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Tim Mayotte | 7-5 7-6 7-6 | Francisco Gonzalez | Match data |
| Dec 6, 1982* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Tim Mayotte | 7-6 6-3 6-2 | Francisco Gonzalez | Match data |
| Jan 24, 1981* | San Juan | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Francisco Gonzalez | 6-4 6-2 | Tim Mayotte | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tim Mayotte | #1,103 | #7 | 1,274 | 2,047 | 333 | 194 | 63.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 12 |
| Francisco Gonzalez | #997 | #40 | 0 | 1,758 | 105 | 157 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tim Mayotte | Francisco Gonzalez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1979 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1980 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #171 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1981 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #33 | 1,800 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #272 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1982 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #30 | 1,809 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #212 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1983 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #16 | 1,902 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #61 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1984 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #44 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #77 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1985 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #12 | 1,919 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #74 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1986 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #15 | 1,855 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #98 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1987 | 44–13 | 77.2% | #9 | 1,981 | 0 | 7 | 1982 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #98 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1988 | 42–15 | 73.7% | #10 | 1,909 | 0 | 11 | 1983 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #99 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1989 | 29–15 | 65.9% | #13 | 1,913 | 0 | 12 | 1984 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #82 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1990 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #37 | 1,745 | 0 | 12 | 1985 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #140 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1991 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #115 | 1,716 | 0 | 12 | 1986 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #548 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1097 | 1,698 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |