H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Tim Mayotte vs Leo Palin H2H: 2-0
Tim Mayotte holds a 2–0 lead over Leo Palin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tim Mayotte leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tim Mayotte won the 1984 US Open second round 6-4 6-4 3-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 65
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
FIN
Age 69
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 1984* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Tim Mayotte | 6-4 6-4 3-6 6-1 | Leo Palin | Match data |
| Apr 2, 1982* | Frankfurt | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Tim Mayotte | 6-3 6-7 6-1 | Leo Palin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tim Mayotte | #1,103 | #7 | 1,274 | 2,047 | 333 | 194 | 63.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 12 |
| Leo Palin | #904 | #92 | 0 | 1,559 | 28 | 60 | 31.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tim Mayotte | Leo Palin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1979 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #399 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1980 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #171 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1981 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #33 | 1,800 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #332 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1982 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #30 | 1,809 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #236 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1983 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #16 | 1,902 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #135 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1984 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #44 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #197 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1985 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #12 | 1,919 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #197 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1986 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #15 | 1,855 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #99 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1987 | 44–13 | 77.2% | #9 | 1,981 | 0 | 7 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #216 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1988 | 42–15 | 73.7% | #10 | 1,909 | 0 | 11 | 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #234 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1989 | 29–15 | 65.9% | #13 | 1,913 | 0 | 12 | 1985 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #277 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1990 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #37 | 1,745 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1991 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #115 | 1,716 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1097 | 1,698 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |