H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Tim Mayotte vs Mel Purcell H2H: 2-1
Tim Mayotte holds a 2–1 lead over Mel Purcell in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Tim Mayotte leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Tim Mayotte won the 1983 Los Angeles fourth round 2-6 6-2 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 65
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 67
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 1983* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Tim Mayotte | 2-6 6-2 7-6 | Mel Purcell | Match data |
| Sep 23, 1982* | San Francisco | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Tim Mayotte | 6-2 6-3 | Mel Purcell | Match data |
| Aug 22, 1981* | Atlanta | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Mel Purcell | 7-5 6-1 | Tim Mayotte | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tim Mayotte | #1,103 | #7 | 1,274 | 2,047 | 333 | 194 | 63.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 12 |
| Mel Purcell | #673 | #21 | 21 | 1,991 | 190 | 164 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tim Mayotte | Mel Purcell | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1979 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1980 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #171 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #245 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1981 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #33 | 1,800 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #27 | 1,742 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1982 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #30 | 1,809 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 48–20 | 70.6% | #24 | 1,914 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1983 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #16 | 1,902 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #28 | 1,837 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1984 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #44 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #28 | 1,770 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1985 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #12 | 1,919 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #67 | 1,702 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1986 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #15 | 1,855 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #129 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1987 | 44–13 | 77.2% | #9 | 1,981 | 0 | 7 | 1986 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #72 | 1,649 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1988 | 42–15 | 73.7% | #10 | 1,909 | 0 | 11 | 1987 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #140 | 1,529 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1989 | 29–15 | 65.9% | #13 | 1,913 | 0 | 12 | 1988 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #268 | 1,537 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1990 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #37 | 1,745 | 0 | 12 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #504 | 1,525 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1991 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #115 | 1,716 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1097 | 1,698 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |