H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Tim Mayotte vs Tomas Smid H2H: 2-0
Tim Mayotte holds a 2–0 lead over Tomas Smid in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tim Mayotte leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tim Mayotte won the 1986 Wimbledon third round 6-4 6-2 2-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 65
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 70
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 1986* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Tim Mayotte | 6-4 6-2 2-6 6-2 | Tomas Smid | Match data |
| Apr 28, 1984* | Dallas Wct | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Tim Mayotte | 6-2 4-6 7-6 6-3 | Tomas Smid | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tim Mayotte | #1,103 | #7 | 1,274 | 2,047 | 333 | 194 | 63.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 12 |
| Tomas Smid | #975 | #11 | 28 | 1,998 | 497 | 318 | 61.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tim Mayotte | Tomas Smid | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1979 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1980 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #171 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1981 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #33 | 1,800 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #154 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1982 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #30 | 1,809 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #67 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1983 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #16 | 1,902 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1984 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #44 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 50–25 | 66.7% | #27 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1985 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #12 | 1,919 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #23 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1986 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #15 | 1,855 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 54–28 | 65.9% | #28 | 1,864 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1987 | 44–13 | 77.2% | #9 | 1,981 | 0 | 7 | 1982 | 62–28 | 68.9% | #24 | 1,901 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 1988 | 42–15 | 73.7% | #10 | 1,909 | 0 | 11 | 1983 | 59–30 | 66.3% | #17 | 1,902 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 1989 | 29–15 | 65.9% | #13 | 1,913 | 0 | 12 | 1984 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #16 | 1,840 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 1990 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #37 | 1,745 | 0 | 12 | 1985 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #19 | 1,804 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 1991 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #115 | 1,716 | 0 | 12 | 1986 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #54 | 1,721 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1097 | 1,698 | 0 | 12 | 1987 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,729 | 0 | 10 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #115 | 1,656 | 0 | 10 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #453 | 1,537 | 0 | 10 |