H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Todd Martin vs Albert Costa H2H: 2-1
Todd Martin holds a 2–1 lead over Albert Costa in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Todd Martin leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Albert Costa won the 1999 Estoril final 7-6(4) 2-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 56
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 51
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 1999* | Estoril | ATP 250 | F | Clay | Albert Costa | 7-6(4) 2-6 6-3 | Todd Martin | Match data |
| Oct 10, 1996* | Vienna | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Todd Martin | 6-3 6-2 | Albert Costa | Match data |
| May 17, 1995* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Todd Martin | 7-6(3) 5-7 6-3 | Albert Costa | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Todd Martin | #145 | #4 | 2,969 | 2,063 | 398 | 222 | 64.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Albert Costa | #669 | #6 | 2,385 | 1,996 | 368 | 263 | 58.3% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Todd Martin | Albert Costa | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #221 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #269 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #52 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #134 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1992 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #87 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 46–26 | 63.9% | #13 | 1,750 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1993 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #13 | 1,886 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,830 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 1994 | 50–19 | 72.5% | #10 | 1,943 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 47–26 | 64.4% | #14 | 1,759 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 1995 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #18 | 1,912 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #18 | 1,810 | 0 | 11 |
| 25 | 1996 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #12 | 1,926 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #26 | 1,779 | 0 | 11 |
| 26 | 1997 | 13–7 | 65.0% | #81 | 1,914 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #40 | 1,807 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | 1998 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #16 | 1,998 | 0 | 7 | 2002 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #9 | 1,796 | 1 | 12 |
| 28 | 1999 | 42–17 | 71.2% | #7 | 1,914 | 0 | 8 | 2003 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #25 | 1,767 | 1 | 12 |
| 29 | 2000 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #55 | 1,887 | 0 | 8 | 2004 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #56 | 1,668 | 1 | 12 |
| 30 | 2001 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #57 | 1,823 | 0 | 8 | 2005 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #116 | 1,619 | 1 | 12 |
| 31 | 2002 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #47 | 1,788 | 0 | 8 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #623 | 1,631 | 1 | 12 |
| 32 | 2003 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #68 | 1,828 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2004 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #145 | 1,684 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |