H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 01:16 UTC
Todd Martin vs Albert Portas H2H: 1-0
Todd Martin holds a 1–0 lead over Albert Portas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Todd Martin leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Todd Martin won the 1998 Rome Masters second round 5-7 7-6(2) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 56
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 1998* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Todd Martin | 5-7 7-6(2) 6-4 | Albert Portas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Todd Martin | #145 | #4 | 2,969 | 2,063 | 398 | 222 | 64.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Albert Portas | #1,082 | #19 | 1,350 | 1,826 | 142 | 198 | 41.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Todd Martin | Albert Portas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1990 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #269 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #392 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #134 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1992 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #87 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #119 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #13 | 1,886 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 50–19 | 72.5% | #10 | 1,943 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #35 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #18 | 1,912 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #84 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #12 | 1,926 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 13–7 | 65.0% | #81 | 1,914 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1998 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #16 | 1,998 | 0 | 7 | 2001 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #20 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1999 | 42–17 | 71.2% | #7 | 1,914 | 0 | 8 | 2002 | 9–23 | 28.1% | #88 | 1,525 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2000 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #55 | 1,887 | 0 | 8 | 2003 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #85 | 1,523 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2001 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #57 | 1,823 | 0 | 8 | 2004 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #175 | 1,443 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2002 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #47 | 1,788 | 0 | 8 | 2005 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #119 | 1,437 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2003 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #68 | 1,828 | 0 | 8 | 2006 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #140 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2004 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #145 | 1,684 | 0 | 8 | 2007 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #338 | 1,548 | 0 | 1 |