H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Todd Martin vs Cecil Mamiit H2H: 2-1

Todd Martin holds a 2–1 lead over Cecil Mamiit in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Todd Martin leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Cecil Mamiit leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Todd Martin won the 2001 Cincinnati Open round of 64 2-6 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Todd Martin
USA Age 56 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Cecil Mamiit
PHI Age 50 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Todd Martin #29 2-6 6-3 6-3 Cecil Mamiit #112 Match data Aug 8, 2001* R64 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard
Cecil Mamiit #112 6-3 7-6(6) 2-6 6-1 Todd Martin #33 Match data May 30, 2001* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Todd Martin #28 6-3 6-3 Cecil Mamiit #112 Match data Aug 16, 2000* R64 Indianapolis ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Todd Martin #145 #4 2,969 2,064 398 223 64.1% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Cecil Mamiit #1,573 #72 625 1,631 48 95 33.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Todd Martin Cecil Mamiit
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1990 3–4 42.9% #269 1,515 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1991 10–8 55.6% #134 1,652 0 0 1996 0–4 0.0% #200 1,471 0 0
21 1992 22–19 53.7% #87 1,724 0 0 1997 2–7 22.2% #229 1,441 0 0
22 1993 45–23 66.2% #13 1,886 0 1 1998 0–1 0.0% #130 1,432 0 0
23 1994 50–19 72.5% #10 1,945 0 3 1999 16–18 47.1% #93 1,552 0 0
24 1995 45–21 68.2% #18 1,913 0 4 2000 6–12 33.3% #121 1,537 0 0
25 1996 49–20 71.0% #12 1,923 0 5 2001 10–18 35.7% #111 1,555 0 0
26 1997 13–7 65.0% #81 1,913 0 5 2002 8–14 36.4% #111 1,555 0 0
27 1998 43–20 68.3% #16 1,998 0 7 2003 3–15 16.7% #183 1,433 0 0
28 1999 42–17 71.2% #7 1,914 0 8 2004 1–3 25.0% #226 1,492 0 0
29 2000 14–12 53.8% #55 1,862 0 8 2005 1–2 33.3% #209 1,469 0 0
30 2001 13–11 54.2% #57 1,816 0 8 — — — — — — —
31 2002 24–16 60.0% #47 1,785 0 8 — — — — — — —
32 2003 15–11 57.7% #68 1,842 0 8 2008 1–1 50.0% #462 1,468 0 0
33 2004 10–15 40.0% #145 1,688 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Todd Martin Cecil Mamiit
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1990 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1991 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1996 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1992 12 10 22 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1997 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1993 21 12 33 63.6% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 2 10 80.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1994 22 8 30 73.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 10 1 11 90.9% 8 6 14 57.1% 1999 13 12 25 52.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
24 1995 25 10 35 71.4% 7 4 11 63.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 2000 6 11 17 35.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 1996 29 10 39 74.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 7 4 11 63.6% 2001 8 14 22 36.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
26 1997 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 2002 6 9 15 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
27 1998 26 12 38 68.4% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2003 2 9 11 18.2% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 1999 30 11 41 73.2% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 2004 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2000 11 7 18 61.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
30 2001 8 6 14 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 17 11 28 60.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2003 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2008 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2004 5 9 14 35.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 227 122 349 65.0% 64 42 106 60.4% 59 25 84 70.2% 48 34 82 58.5% — 39 71 110 35.5% 4 10 14 28.6% 4 13 17 23.5% 1 1 2 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 49/51 of Todd Martin's and 128/143 of Cecil Mamiit's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Todd Martin Cecil Mamiit
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 3/4 2.7 5.3 45.4% 60.2% 51.2% 50.2% 42.9% 55.3% 33.2%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 8/9 4.4 2.0 59.6% 67.9% 47.4% 49.8% 55.1% 59.7% 35.8%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 1/1 3.0 2.0 61.5% 70.8% 56.7% 42.9% 80.0% 65.4% 42.9%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 32/34 2.6 3.0 57.3% 65.9% 47.7% 50.8% 38.8% 58.0% 39.6%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 14/18 2.4 2.8 54.3% 67.2% 48.8% 56.2% 38.3% 59.0% 36.7%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 23/28 4.2 3.0 58.1% 67.3% 49.1% 61.8% 35.1% 59.7% 36.4%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 20/22 3.5 3.3 57.9% 66.7% 49.9% 60.6% 39.4% 59.5% 37.2%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 18/18 1.8 2.7 62.6% 62.6% 42.3% 49.5% 41.2% 55.2% 34.4%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 4/4 3.8 1.8 51.5% 68.5% 51.2% 54.3% 24.2% 59.9% 37.9%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 3/3 3.7 2.0 68.5% 74.3% 58.9% 36.4% 27.8% 69.5% 36.5%
32 2003 24/26 10.0 5.2 58.9% 77.1% 51.2% 63.9% 49.9% 66.4% 36.8% 2008 2/2 5.5 2.0 60.9% 72.3% 51.4% 61.1% 54.2% 63.8% 35.8%
33 2004 25/25 10.5 4.1 62.5% 75.3% 49.7% 57.7% 31.7% 65.7% 35.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 49/621 10.3 4.6 60.8% 76.2% 50.4% 60.7% 40.6% 66.1% 36.0% — 128/143 3.1 2.9 58.0% 66.4% 48.2% 54.5% 39.5% 58.8% 37.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Todd Martin Cecil Mamiit
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1990 1516 114.1 — — — — +28 — — 40.0% 0.00 2–0 0–4 (0%) — +0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1991 1652 125.4 — — — — -62 -40 -7 55.8% +0.56 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) — +1.12 1996 1471 104.3 +1.39 -2.25 0.743 44.8% +17 — — 18.2% -2.27 0–2 1–1 — -0.21
21 1992 1724 141.4 — — — — -19 -110 -46 55.8% +0.54 4–9 (31%) 8–8 (50%) — +0.21 1997 1441 108.9 -1.33 -0.30 0.887 47.8% +21 — — 30.4% -1.17 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — +0.42
22 1993 1887 155.8 — — — — -16 -193 -64 62.4% +0.78 10–9 (53%) 16–17 (48%) — -0.69 1998 1432 101.1 -0.76 -1.41 1.238 53.7% — — — 33.3% +0.33 0–1 — — +0.13
23 1994 1945 157.2 — — — — -18 -177 +80 64.0% +0.94 19–8 (70%) 26–17 (60%) — -1.38 1999 1552 118.6 -2.72 +1.29 0.942 48.7% +21 -25 -7 46.0% -0.43 6–6 (50%) 7–5 (58%) — +1.34
24 1995 1913 152.5 — — — — +27 -141 +46 62.5% +0.71 11–4 (73%) 20–12 (63%) — -0.11 2000 1538 123.5 -0.49 +0.64 0.895 47.9% +26 — — 38.6% -0.75 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.42
25 1996 1923 161.1 — — — — +26 -122 +82 66.3% +1.07 11–10 (52%) 15–12 (56%) — -1.56 2001 1556 118.7 -2.71 -1.19 0.903 48.3% -16 — -31 44.3% -0.54 3–10 (23%) 5–4 (56%) — +1.11
26 1997 1914 152.5 — — — — +27 — — 63.3% +0.53 2–4 (33%) 6–3 (67%) — -1.34 2002 1556 122.3 -2.06 -0.26 0.918 48.5% +28 — -90 38.9% -0.89 1–3 (25%) 6–1 (86%) — +0.65
27 1998 1999 161.9 — — — — +10 -105 -16 64.0% +0.82 12–7 (63%) 19–11 (63%) — -4.34 2003 1434 110.8 -4.02 -1.08 0.769 45.2% +49 +79 +15 26.7% -1.56 1–4 (20%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.14
28 1999 1914 156.7 — — — — +32 +22 +54 63.2% +0.70 14–10 (58%) 26–16 (62%) — -0.18 2004 1493 110.5 -0.62 +1.04 0.944 49.1% +47 — — 37.5% -0.38 1–1 — — -0.32
29 2000 1862 141.9 — — — — +57 +9 +96 54.5% +0.48 3–4 (43%) 7–10 (41%) — -0.87 2005 1469 101.4 +0.98 -1.17 1.195 52.7% +44 — — 60.0% +1.00 0–1 — — +0.37
30 2001 1816 132.4 — — — — +63 -59 +147 51.3% -0.17 6–3 (67%) 6–5 (55%) — -0.33 2006 1430 95.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 1786 147.1 — — — — +51 -34 +125 58.3% +0.40 6–6 (50%) 14–10 (58%) — -2.19 2007 1433 89.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2003 1842 133.5 +2.69 +0.10 1.096 51.8% +8 -108 +98 61.8% +0.46 1–5 (17%) 9–6 (60%) — -0.41 2008 1469 105.8 -0.73 -1.29 0.989 49.4% — — — 40.0% -0.40 1–0 0–1 — +0.10
33 2004 1688 130.3 +1.82 +0.03 1.029 50.4% +23 +23 +195 43.8% -0.21 5–6 (45%) 10–9 (53%) — -1.17 2009 1449 98.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1440 101.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1432 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2064 158.1 +2.25 +0.06 1.062 51.1% +15 -99 +51 60.5% +0.64 108–88 (55%) 185–143 (56%) 101.2 -2.06 — 1631 117.9 -2.17 -0.11 0.899 48.0% +20 +21 -35 39.3% -0.78 15–34 (31%) 24–20 (55%) 99.3 +2.12

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.