H2H data updated: 2026-07-21 02:15 UTC
Todd Martin vs David Pate H2H: 1-0
Todd Martin holds a 1–0 lead over David Pate in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Todd Martin leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Todd Martin won the 1992 Queen's Club second round 3-6 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 56
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 64
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 1992* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R64 | Grass | Todd Martin | 3-6 6-3 6-1 | David Pate | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Todd Martin | #145 | #4 | 2,969 | 2,063 | 398 | 222 | 64.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| David Pate | #911 | #18 | 441 | 1,874 | 181 | 168 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Todd Martin | David Pate | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1990 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #269 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #134 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #87 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #203 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #13 | 1,886 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #30 | 1,743 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1994 | 50–19 | 72.5% | #10 | 1,943 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #26 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1995 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #18 | 1,912 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #30 | 1,787 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1996 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #12 | 1,926 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1997 | 13–7 | 65.0% | #81 | 1,914 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #47 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1998 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #16 | 1,998 | 0 | 7 | 1989 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #157 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1999 | 42–17 | 71.2% | #7 | 1,914 | 0 | 8 | 1990 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #94 | 1,657 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2000 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #55 | 1,887 | 0 | 8 | 1991 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #160 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2001 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #57 | 1,823 | 0 | 8 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #396 | 1,572 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2002 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #47 | 1,788 | 0 | 8 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #514 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2003 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #68 | 1,828 | 0 | 8 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #624 | 1,560 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2004 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #145 | 1,684 | 0 | 8 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #911 | 1,541 | 0 | 2 |