H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Todd Martin vs David Prinosil H2H: 0-2
David Prinosil holds a 2–0 lead over Todd Martin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, David Prinosil leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, David Prinosil won the 1996 Ostrava quarterfinal 7-6(7) 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 56
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 1996* | Ostrava | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | David Prinosil | 7-6(7) 7-6(2) | Todd Martin | Match data |
| May 26, 1993* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | David Prinosil | 7-6(4) 6-3 7-6(0) | Todd Martin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Todd Martin | #145 | #4 | 2,969 | 2,063 | 398 | 222 | 64.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| David Prinosil | #1,091 | #28 | 1,040 | 1,800 | 165 | 208 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Todd Martin | David Prinosil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1990 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #269 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #134 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #77 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #87 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #130 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #13 | 1,886 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #50 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1994 | 50–19 | 72.5% | #10 | 1,943 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #39 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1995 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #18 | 1,912 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #89 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1996 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #12 | 1,926 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #78 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1997 | 13–7 | 65.0% | #81 | 1,914 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #66 | 1,672 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1998 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #16 | 1,998 | 0 | 7 | 2000 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #38 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1999 | 42–17 | 71.2% | #7 | 1,914 | 0 | 8 | 2001 | 7–22 | 24.1% | #132 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2000 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #55 | 1,887 | 0 | 8 | 2002 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #229 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2001 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #57 | 1,823 | 0 | 8 | 2003 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,521 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2002 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #47 | 1,788 | 0 | 8 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1063 | 1,515 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2003 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #68 | 1,828 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2004 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #145 | 1,684 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |