H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Todd Martin vs Fabrice Santoro H2H: 3-2

Todd Martin holds a 3–2 lead over Fabrice Santoro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Todd Martin leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Fabrice Santoro won the 2004 US Open first round 4-6 6-4 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Todd Martin
USA Age 56 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Fabrice Santoro
FRA Age 53 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 1, 2004* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Fabrice Santoro #34 4-6 6-4 6-4 7-5 Todd Martin #96 Match data
Aug 3, 2002* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Fabrice Santoro #40 6-2 6-4 Todd Martin #47 Match data
Oct 28, 1999* Stuttgart Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Todd Martin #4 6-4 6-2 Fabrice Santoro #39 Match data
Aug 12, 1998* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Todd Martin #31 6-1 6-4 Fabrice Santoro #29 Match data
May 7, 1994* Pinehurst ATP 250 QF Clay Todd Martin #9 6-3 6-2 Fabrice Santoro #128 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Todd Martin #145 #4 2,969 2,063 398 222 64.2% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Fabrice Santoro #142 #17 1,516 1,889 456 432 51.4% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Todd Martin Fabrice Santoro
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1989 3–6 33.3% #235 1,509 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1990 15–16 48.4% #62 1,684 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1991 26–21 55.3% #43 1,697 0 0
19 1990 3–4 42.9% #269 1,508 0 0 1992 25–22 53.2% #43 1,728 0 0
20 1991 10–8 55.6% #134 1,648 0 0 1993 24–26 48.0% #55 1,628 0 0
21 1992 22–19 53.7% #87 1,724 0 0 1994 24–18 57.1% #46 1,734 0 0
22 1993 45–23 66.2% #13 1,886 0 1 1995 16–25 39.0% #102 1,609 0 0
23 1994 50–19 72.5% #10 1,943 0 3 1996 6–12 33.3% #118 1,555 0 0
24 1995 45–21 68.2% #18 1,912 0 4 1997 32–23 58.2% #29 1,804 0 1
25 1996 49–20 71.0% #12 1,926 0 5 1998 27–27 50.0% #41 1,709 0 1
26 1997 13–7 65.0% #81 1,914 0 5 1999 36–25 59.0% #34 1,765 0 2
27 1998 43–20 68.3% #16 1,998 0 7 2000 32–26 55.2% #31 1,727 0 3
28 1999 42–17 71.2% #7 1,914 0 8 2001 35–26 57.4% #22 1,769 0 3
29 2000 14–11 56.0% #55 1,887 0 8 2002 27–25 51.9% #35 1,739 0 4
30 2001 13–11 54.2% #57 1,823 0 8 2003 17–21 44.7% #62 1,708 0 4
31 2002 24–16 60.0% #47 1,788 0 8 2004 17–14 54.8% #52 1,817 0 4
32 2003 15–11 57.7% #68 1,828 0 8 2005 18–19 48.6% #58 1,782 0 4
33 2004 10–15 40.0% #145 1,684 0 8 2006 19–23 45.2% #52 1,700 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2007 24–19 55.8% #37 1,785 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2008 18–17 51.4% #52 1,755 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 2009 15–20 42.9% #68 1,694 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #142 1,688 0 6