H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Todd Martin vs Gaston Gaudio H2H: 0-1
Gaston Gaudio holds a 1–0 lead over Todd Martin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gaston Gaudio leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gaston Gaudio won the 2002 US Open first round 6-2 6-3 0-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 56
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 47
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2002* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Gaston Gaudio | 6-2 6-3 0-6 7-5 | Todd Martin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Todd Martin | #145 | #4 | 2,969 | 2,063 | 398 | 222 | 64.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Gaston Gaudio | #1,025 | #5 | 2,440 | 1,998 | 253 | 188 | 57.4% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Todd Martin | Gaston Gaudio | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1990 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #269 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1991 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #134 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #72 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #87 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #34 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #13 | 1,886 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 50–19 | 72.5% | #10 | 1,943 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 39–17 | 69.6% | #21 | 1,828 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1995 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #18 | 1,912 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #34 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1996 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #12 | 1,926 | 0 | 5 | 2004 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #10 | 1,805 | 1 | 3 |
| 26 | 1997 | 13–7 | 65.0% | #81 | 1,914 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 54–20 | 73.0% | #10 | 1,871 | 1 | 8 |
| 27 | 1998 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #16 | 1,998 | 0 | 7 | 2006 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #34 | 1,697 | 1 | 8 |
| 28 | 1999 | 42–17 | 71.2% | #7 | 1,914 | 0 | 8 | 2007 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #182 | 1,625 | 1 | 8 |
| 29 | 2000 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #55 | 1,887 | 0 | 8 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #969 | 1,605 | 1 | 8 |
| 30 | 2001 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #57 | 1,823 | 0 | 8 | 2009 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #167 | 1,524 | 1 | 8 |
| 31 | 2002 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #47 | 1,788 | 0 | 8 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #326 | 1,467 | 1 | 8 |
| 32 | 2003 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #68 | 1,828 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2004 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #145 | 1,684 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |