H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Todd Martin vs Jacco Eltingh H2H: 3-0
Todd Martin holds a 3–0 lead over Jacco Eltingh in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Todd Martin leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Todd Martin won the 1994 Memphis third round 6-7(8) 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 56
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
NED
Age 55
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 1994* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Todd Martin | 6-7(8) 6-3 6-2 | Jacco Eltingh | Match data |
| Feb 12, 1993* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Todd Martin | 6-3 6-3 | Jacco Eltingh | Match data |
| Oct 7, 1992* | Sydney Indoor | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Todd Martin | 6-3 7-6(5) | Jacco Eltingh | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Todd Martin | #145 | #4 | 2,969 | 2,063 | 398 | 222 | 64.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Jacco Eltingh | #1,378 | #19 | 1,332 | 1,874 | 124 | 140 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Todd Martin | Jacco Eltingh | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #269 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #128 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #134 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #114 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #87 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #78 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1993 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #13 | 1,886 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #63 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1994 | 50–19 | 72.5% | #10 | 1,943 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 40–23 | 63.5% | #23 | 1,828 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1995 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #18 | 1,912 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #43 | 1,771 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1996 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #12 | 1,926 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #307 | 1,634 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1997 | 13–7 | 65.0% | #81 | 1,914 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #604 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1998 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #16 | 1,998 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1999 | 42–17 | 71.2% | #7 | 1,914 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2000 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #55 | 1,887 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2001 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #57 | 1,823 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2002 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #47 | 1,788 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2003 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #68 | 1,828 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2004 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #145 | 1,684 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |