H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Todd Martin vs Jim Grabb H2H: 3-1

Todd Martin holds a 3–1 lead over Jim Grabb in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Todd Martin leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Jim Grabb leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Todd Martin won the 1997 San Jose round of 16 6-3 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Todd Martin
USA Age 56 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Jim Grabb
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Todd Martin #14 6-3 7-6(5) Jim Grabb #209 Match data Feb 14, 1997* R16 San Jose World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Todd Martin #12 6-2 3-6 7-6(1) Jim Grabb #211 Match data Nov 7, 1996* R32 Stockholm Open World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Todd Martin #18 6-2 6-4 7-6(5) Jim Grabb #241 Match data Jun 28, 1996* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Jim Grabb #192 6-4 3-6 6-4 Todd Martin #8 Match data Feb 18, 1994* R16 Philadelphia ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Todd Martin #145 #4 2,969 2,064 398 223 64.1% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Jim Grabb #927 #24 760 1,828 179 199 47.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Todd Martin Jim Grabb
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1990 3–4 42.9% #269 1,515 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1991 10–8 55.6% #134 1,652 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1992 22–19 53.7% #87 1,724 0 0 1985 4–4 50.0% #251 1,560 0 0
22 1993 45–23 66.2% #13 1,886 0 1 1986 7–6 53.8% #94 1,636 0 0
23 1994 50–19 72.5% #10 1,945 0 3 1987 20–18 52.6% #66 1,687 0 1
24 1995 45–21 68.2% #18 1,913 0 4 1988 17–23 42.5% #91 1,562 0 1
25 1996 49–20 71.0% #12 1,923 0 5 1989 27–20 57.4% #35 1,767 0 1
26 1997 13–7 65.0% #81 1,913 0 5 1990 16–18 47.1% #72 1,688 0 1
27 1998 43–20 68.3% #16 1,998 0 7 1991 19–23 45.2% #87 1,680 0 1
28 1999 42–17 71.2% #7 1,914 0 8 1992 31–24 56.4% #55 1,748 0 2
29 2000 14–12 53.8% #55 1,862 0 8 1993 6–9 40.0% #197 1,690 0 2
30 2001 13–11 54.2% #57 1,816 0 8 1994 18–20 47.4% #68 1,670 0 2
31 2002 24–16 60.0% #47 1,785 0 8 1995 6–17 26.1% #207 1,545 0 2
32 2003 15–11 57.7% #68 1,842 0 8 1996 6–10 37.5% #199 1,564 0 2
33 2004 10–15 40.0% #145 1,688 0 8 1997 2–7 22.2% #342 1,516 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Todd Martin Jim Grabb
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1990 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1991 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1992 12 10 22 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1985 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1993 21 12 33 63.6% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 2 10 80.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1986 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
23 1994 22 8 30 73.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 10 1 11 90.9% 8 6 14 57.1% 1987 14 9 23 60.9% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2%
24 1995 25 10 35 71.4% 7 4 11 63.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 1988 10 14 24 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
25 1996 29 10 39 74.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 7 4 11 63.6% 1989 25 14 39 64.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
26 1997 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 1990 10 7 17 58.8% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
27 1998 26 12 38 68.4% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1991 13 13 26 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
28 1999 30 11 41 73.2% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1992 16 15 31 51.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 12 5 17 70.6%
29 2000 11 7 18 61.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1993 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
30 2001 8 6 14 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 1994 14 12 26 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
31 2002 17 11 28 60.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 1995 5 14 19 26.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
32 2003 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1996 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
33 2004 5 9 14 35.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1997 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 227 122 349 65.0% 64 42 106 60.4% 59 25 84 70.2% 48 34 82 58.5% — 126 125 251 50.2% 3 13 16 18.8% 10 20 30 33.3% 40 41 81 49.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 49/51 of Todd Martin's and 169/198 of Jim Grabb's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Todd Martin Jim Grabb
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 37/42 7.0 4.0 64.9% 72.2% 48.6% 59.8% 37.6% 64.1% 36.3%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 50/55 6.4 3.1 64.6% 75.8% 47.8% 54.4% 35.0% 66.0% 35.6%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 13/15 5.1 3.0 70.6% 65.7% 48.5% 60.1% 52.2% 59.9% 35.2%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 33/38 5.2 3.0 68.5% 69.1% 45.9% 59.0% 49.0% 61.9% 35.7%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 20/23 5.7 2.9 64.8% 68.9% 47.3% 65.1% 27.2% 61.3% 32.8%
32 2003 24/26 10.0 5.2 58.9% 77.1% 51.2% 63.9% 49.9% 66.4% 36.8% 1996 10/16 7.1 5.5 65.1% 74.5% 44.0% 58.1% 52.2% 63.5% 33.7%
33 2004 25/25 10.5 4.1 62.5% 75.3% 49.7% 57.7% 31.7% 65.7% 35.3% 1997 6/9 4.3 6.5 63.9% 71.6% 34.5% 48.0% 42.7% 58.1% 32.5%
Career — 49/621 10.3 4.6 60.8% 76.2% 50.4% 60.7% 40.6% 66.1% 36.0% — 169/378 6.1 3.5 65.9% 71.9% 46.9% 58.2% 40.0% 63.3% 35.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Todd Martin Jim Grabb
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1990 1516 114.1 — — — — +28 — — 40.0% 0.00 2–0 0–4 (0%) — +0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1991 1652 125.4 — — — — -62 -40 -7 55.8% +0.56 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) — +1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1992 1724 141.4 — — — — -19 -110 -46 55.8% +0.54 4–9 (31%) 8–8 (50%) — +0.21 1985 1560 123.7 — — — — +46 — — 47.6% -0.24 1–1 0–2 — +0.16
22 1993 1887 155.8 — — — — -16 -193 -64 62.4% +0.78 10–9 (53%) 16–17 (48%) — -0.69 1986 1636 129.6 — — — — +34 — — 50.0% +0.40 3–1 (75%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.05
23 1994 1945 157.2 — — — — -18 -177 +80 64.0% +0.94 19–8 (70%) 26–17 (60%) — -1.38 1987 1688 137.5 — — — — +49 — — 48.8% +0.04 4–2 (67%) 10–2 (83%) — +1.31
24 1995 1913 152.5 — — — — +27 -141 +46 62.5% +0.71 11–4 (73%) 20–12 (63%) — -0.11 1988 1562 123.6 — — — — +13 -58 -17 45.0% -0.28 6–6 (50%) 8–7 (53%) — -0.31
25 1996 1923 161.1 — — — — +26 -122 +82 66.3% +1.07 11–10 (52%) 15–12 (56%) — -1.56 1989 1768 139.4 — — — — +19 — — 56.7% +0.35 6–9 (40%) 13–10 (57%) — -1.18
26 1997 1914 152.5 — — — — +27 — — 63.3% +0.53 2–4 (33%) 6–3 (67%) — -1.34 1990 1689 132.1 — — — — +29 -250 -88 48.2% -0.14 5–5 (50%) 6–8 (43%) — -0.10
27 1998 1999 161.9 — — — — +10 -105 -16 64.0% +0.82 12–7 (63%) 19–11 (63%) — -4.34 1991 1681 136.8 +1.98 -1.92 1.009 50.2% +35 — -107 51.3% +0.05 7–17 (29%) 9–10 (47%) — +0.72
28 1999 1914 156.7 — — — — +32 +22 +54 63.2% +0.70 14–10 (58%) 26–16 (62%) — -0.18 1992 1749 141.9 +3.85 -1.34 1.048 50.4% +32 -275 -178 52.2% +0.19 11–7 (61%) 11–11 (50%) — +1.42
29 2000 1862 141.9 — — — — +57 +9 +96 54.5% +0.48 3–4 (43%) 7–10 (41%) — -0.87 1993 1691 122.3 -0.49 -1.37 0.878 47.6% +9 — — 45.9% -0.22 2–3 (40%) 5–6 (45%) — +0.36
30 2001 1816 132.4 — — — — +63 -59 +147 51.3% -0.17 6–3 (67%) 6–5 (55%) — -0.33 1994 1670 136.2 +0.52 -2.08 0.937 48.9% +50 — -139 50.0% +0.04 7–8 (47%) 5–8 (38%) — +0.09
31 2002 1786 147.1 — — — — +51 -34 +125 58.3% +0.40 6–6 (50%) 14–10 (58%) — -2.19 1995 1546 127.6 -0.66 -2.43 0.847 47.4% +34 — — 33.3% -1.11 2–5 (29%) 4–9 (31%) — -1.25
32 2003 1842 133.5 +2.69 +0.10 1.096 51.8% +8 -108 +98 61.8% +0.46 1–5 (17%) 9–6 (60%) — -0.41 1996 1565 120.0 +0.58 -1.86 0.923 48.7% +2 — — 41.9% -0.53 3–3 (50%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.17
33 2004 1688 130.3 +1.82 +0.03 1.029 50.4% +23 +23 +195 43.8% -0.21 5–6 (45%) 10–9 (53%) — -1.17 1997 1516 104.9 -2.13 -1.64 0.777 45.3% +9 — — 28.6% -1.57 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.17
Career — 2064 158.1 +2.25 +0.06 1.062 51.1% +15 -99 +51 60.5% +0.64 108–88 (55%) 185–143 (56%) 101.2 -2.06 — 1829 140.2 +1.52 -1.78 0.959 49.2% +30 -207 -101 48.5% -0.08 58–69 (46%) 75–85 (47%) 96.6 +0.43

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.