H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Todd Martin vs Jimmy Arias H2H: 1-0

Todd Martin holds a 1–0 lead over Jimmy Arias in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Todd Martin leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Todd Martin won the 1992 Atlanta round of 32 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Todd Martin
USA Age 56 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Jimmy Arias
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Todd Martin #115 6-2 6-1 Jimmy Arias #124 Match data Apr 30, 1992* R32 Atlanta ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Todd Martin #145 #4 2,969 2,064 398 223 64.1% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Jimmy Arias #714 #5 587 2,061 281 217 56.4% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Todd Martin Jimmy Arias
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1980 3–5 37.5% #255 1,531 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1981 10–10 50.0% #84 1,626 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1982 30–17 63.8% #21 1,858 0 1
18 — — — — — — — 1983 47–15 75.8% #6 2,039 0 5
19 1990 3–4 42.9% #269 1,515 0 0 1984 35–19 64.8% #14 1,878 0 5
20 1991 10–8 55.6% #134 1,652 0 0 1985 32–21 60.4% #21 1,811 0 5
21 1992 22–19 53.7% #87 1,724 0 0 1986 18–19 48.6% #48 1,668 0 5
22 1993 45–23 66.2% #13 1,886 0 1 1987 22–18 55.0% #34 1,720 0 5
23 1994 50–19 72.5% #10 1,945 0 3 1988 7–14 33.3% #106 1,615 0 5
24 1995 45–21 68.2% #18 1,913 0 4 1989 17–17 50.0% #92 1,695 0 5
25 1996 49–20 71.0% #12 1,923 0 5 1990 24–26 48.0% #60 1,681 0 5
26 1997 13–7 65.0% #81 1,913 0 5 1991 23–19 54.8% #63 1,692 0 5
27 1998 43–20 68.3% #16 1,998 0 7 1992 4–8 33.3% #195 1,644 0 5
28 1999 42–17 71.2% #7 1,914 0 8 1993 5–4 55.6% #178 1,664 0 5
29 2000 14–12 53.8% #55 1,862 0 8 1994 3–4 42.9% #334 1,639 0 5
30 2001 13–11 54.2% #57 1,816 0 8 — — — — — — —
31 2002 24–16 60.0% #47 1,785 0 8 — — — — — — —
32 2003 15–11 57.7% #68 1,842 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2004 10–15 40.0% #145 1,688 0 8 1998 1–1 50.0% #711 1,641 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Todd Martin Jimmy Arias
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 5 4 9 55.6% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 3 4 7 42.9% 22 9 31 71.0% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 8 2 10 80.0% 38 9 47 80.9% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0%
19 1990 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1984 9 6 15 60.0% 17 8 25 68.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
20 1991 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1985 24 9 33 72.7% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
21 1992 12 10 22 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1986 8 11 19 42.1% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1993 21 12 33 63.6% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 2 10 80.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1987 9 8 17 52.9% 13 8 21 61.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1994 22 8 30 73.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 10 1 11 90.9% 8 6 14 57.1% 1988 1 7 8 12.5% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — —
24 1995 25 10 35 71.4% 7 4 11 63.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 1989 11 9 20 55.0% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1996 29 10 39 74.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 7 4 11 63.6% 1990 14 13 27 51.9% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9%
26 1997 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 1991 14 13 27 51.9% 9 6 15 60.0% — — — — — — — —
27 1998 26 12 38 68.4% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1992 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1999 30 11 41 73.2% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1993 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
29 2000 11 7 18 61.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1994 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
30 2001 8 6 14 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 17 11 28 60.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2003 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2004 5 9 14 35.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1998 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 227 122 349 65.0% 64 42 106 60.4% 59 25 84 70.2% 48 34 82 58.5% — 120 100 220 54.5% 142 88 230 61.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 16 26 42 38.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 49/51 of Todd Martin's and 63/72 of Jimmy Arias's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Todd Martin Jimmy Arias
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 39/42 1.8 2.8 69.8% 62.0% 49.5% 56.5% 42.3% 58.2% 41.0%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 8/12 2.1 2.4 70.1% 61.2% 48.1% 53.6% 48.5% 57.0% 35.3%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 9/9 1.4 3.6 69.5% 66.8% 47.3% 51.6% 38.0% 60.7% 38.2%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 5/7 2.6 2.6 62.9% 65.2% 48.9% 58.4% 41.0% 58.4% 34.6%
32 2003 24/26 10.0 5.2 58.9% 77.1% 51.2% 63.9% 49.9% 66.4% 36.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2004 25/25 10.5 4.1 62.5% 75.3% 49.7% 57.7% 31.7% 65.7% 35.3% 1998 2/2 1.0 3.5 59.3% 61.1% 46.7% 55.0% 50.0% 55.4% 32.1%
Career — 49/621 10.3 4.6 60.8% 76.2% 50.4% 60.7% 40.6% 66.1% 36.0% — 63/498 1.8 2.9 68.9% 62.8% 48.9% 55.6% 42.6% 58.3% 39.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Todd Martin Jimmy Arias
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1531 118.3 — — — — +61 — — 45.5% -0.23 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 95.9 +0.21
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1626 120.1 — — — — +15 -65 — 55.8% +0.09 2–3 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 101.1 +1.61
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1858 146.3 — — — — -127 -26 — 62.1% +0.66 10–11 (48%) 10–7 (59%) 104.8 +1.99
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 2040 155.5 — — — — -177 +21 — 65.4% +0.69 14–5 (74%) 16–9 (64%) 109.5 -0.41
19 1990 1516 114.1 — — — — +28 — — 40.0% 0.00 2–0 0–4 (0%) — +0.50 1984 1879 150.8 — — — — -5 +97 -247 58.1% +0.40 15–7 (68%) 17–7 (71%) 106.2 -2.32
20 1991 1652 125.4 — — — — -62 -40 -7 55.8% +0.56 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) 100.0 +1.12 1985 1812 143.3 — — — — +55 +10 — 56.2% +0.36 14–11 (56%) 15–11 (58%) 100.9 +1.26
21 1992 1724 141.4 — — — — -19 -110 -46 55.8% +0.54 4–9 (31%) 8–8 (50%) 97.1 +0.21 1986 1669 139.2 — — — — +2 +190 — 50.0% -0.14 5–8 (38%) 5–3 (63%) 96.7 -0.60
22 1993 1887 155.8 — — — — -16 -193 -64 62.4% +0.78 10–9 (53%) 16–17 (48%) 100.9 -0.69 1987 1721 145.4 — — — — -8 +100 — 52.7% +0.26 7–7 (50%) 9–9 (50%) 99.0 -2.03
23 1994 1945 157.2 — — — — -18 -177 +80 64.0% +0.94 19–8 (70%) 26–17 (60%) 107.1 -1.38 1988 1615 129.7 — — — — +8 +119 — 35.8% -0.34 3–3 (50%) 2–6 (25%) 96.2 -0.94
24 1995 1913 152.5 — — — — +27 -141 +46 62.5% +0.71 11–4 (73%) 20–12 (63%) 108.7 -0.11 1989 1696 146.3 — — — — -18 +50 — 52.9% +0.24 4–9 (31%) 8–5 (62%) 100.1 -2.89
25 1996 1923 161.1 — — — — +26 -122 +82 66.3% +1.07 11–10 (52%) 15–12 (56%) 98.3 -1.56 1990 1681 136.8 — — — — -3 +36 — 46.7% -0.13 8–8 (50%) 7–11 (39%) 95.7 -1.09
26 1997 1914 152.5 — — — — +27 — — 63.3% +0.53 2–4 (33%) 6–3 (67%) 97.1 -1.34 1991 1693 129.8 -2.05 +1.95 0.980 49.6% +10 +39 — 50.9% -0.16 8–4 (67%) 11–6 (65%) 107.1 +0.40
27 1998 1999 161.9 — — — — +10 -105 -16 64.0% +0.82 12–7 (63%) 19–11 (63%) 106.8 -4.34 1992 1645 115.7 -2.91 -0.85 0.820 46.5% +25 — — 35.5% -1.00 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.9 -0.26
28 1999 1914 156.7 — — — — +32 +22 +54 63.2% +0.70 14–10 (58%) 26–16 (62%) 99.2 -0.18 1993 1664 121.0 -0.94 -1.03 0.971 49.6% +45 -7 — 52.4% -0.19 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — +0.34
29 2000 1862 141.9 — — — — +57 +9 +96 54.5% +0.48 3–4 (43%) 7–10 (41%) 93.4 -0.87 1994 1639 110.6 +0.21 -2.37 0.831 46.2% +51 -6 — 43.8% -0.06 1–1 0–2 — +0.36
30 2001 1816 132.4 — — — — +63 -59 +147 51.3% -0.17 6–3 (67%) 6–5 (55%) 100.3 -0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 1786 147.1 — — — — +51 -34 +125 58.3% +0.40 6–6 (50%) 14–10 (58%) 98.5 -2.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2003 1842 133.5 +2.69 +0.10 1.096 51.8% +8 -108 +98 61.8% +0.46 1–5 (17%) 9–6 (60%) 94.9 -0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2004 1688 130.3 +1.82 +0.03 1.029 50.4% +23 +23 +195 43.8% -0.21 5–6 (45%) 10–9 (53%) 98.0 -1.17 1998 1641 103.3 -1.51 -0.94 0.721 43.7% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.03
Career — 2064 158.1 +2.25 +0.06 1.062 51.1% +15 -99 +51 60.5% +0.64 108–88 (55%) 185–143 (56%) 101.2 -2.06 — 2061 148.5 -1.80 +0.73 0.937 48.8% -6 +47 -247 53.9% +0.19 96–84 (53%) 108–83 (57%) 104.3 -0.89

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.