H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Todd Martin vs Jose Acasuso H2H: 2-0

Todd Martin holds a 2–0 lead over Jose Acasuso in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Todd Martin leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Todd Martin won the 2003 Cincinnati Open round of 64 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Todd Martin
USA Age 56 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Jose Acasuso
ARG Age 43 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Todd Martin #107 6-3 6-4 Jose Acasuso #76 Match data Aug 13, 2003* R64 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard
Todd Martin #94 4-6 6-3 6-4 6-2 Jose Acasuso #50 Match data May 28, 2003* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Todd Martin #145 #4 2,969 2,064 398 223 64.1% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Jose Acasuso #1,107 #20 1,640 1,830 181 178 50.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Todd Martin Jose Acasuso
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2001 8–12 40.0% #86 1,536 0 0
19 1990 3–4 42.9% #269 1,515 0 0 2002 21–17 55.3% #41 1,666 0 1
20 1991 10–8 55.6% #134 1,652 0 0 2003 11–19 36.7% #101 1,614 0 1
21 1992 22–19 53.7% #87 1,724 0 0 2004 18–16 52.9% #67 1,685 0 2
22 1993 45–23 66.2% #13 1,886 0 1 2005 27–26 50.9% #40 1,725 0 2
23 1994 50–19 72.5% #10 1,945 0 3 2006 28–20 58.3% #27 1,710 0 3
24 1995 45–21 68.2% #18 1,913 0 4 2007 18–19 48.6% #65 1,686 0 3
25 1996 49–20 71.0% #12 1,923 0 5 2008 26–24 52.0% #48 1,697 0 3
26 1997 13–7 65.0% #81 1,913 0 5 2009 21–21 50.0% #51 1,733 0 3
27 1998 43–20 68.3% #16 1,998 0 7 2010 1–3 25.0% #253 1,667 0 3
28 1999 42–17 71.2% #7 1,914 0 8 2011 2–1 66.7% #255 1,657 0 3
29 2000 14–12 53.8% #55 1,862 0 8 — — — — — — —
30 2001 13–11 54.2% #57 1,816 0 8 — — — — — — —
31 2002 24–16 60.0% #47 1,785 0 8 — — — — — — —
32 2003 15–11 57.7% #68 1,842 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2004 10–15 40.0% #145 1,688 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Todd Martin Jose Acasuso
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1 3 4 25.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 1990 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2002 1 4 5 20.0% 20 10 30 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 1991 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2003 3 8 11 27.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
21 1992 12 10 22 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 2004 0 3 3 0.0% 18 11 29 62.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 1993 21 12 33 63.6% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 2 10 80.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 2005 9 10 19 47.4% 16 14 30 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
23 1994 22 8 30 73.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 10 1 11 90.9% 8 6 14 57.1% 2006 6 10 16 37.5% 20 8 28 71.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
24 1995 25 10 35 71.4% 7 4 11 63.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 2007 5 7 12 41.7% 13 12 25 52.0% — — — — — — — —
25 1996 29 10 39 74.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 7 4 11 63.6% 2008 10 12 22 45.5% 16 12 28 57.1% — — — — — — — —
26 1997 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 2009 7 8 15 46.7% 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1998 26 12 38 68.4% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2010 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1999 30 11 41 73.2% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 2011 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
29 2000 11 7 18 61.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2001 8 6 14 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 17 11 28 60.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2003 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2004 5 9 14 35.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 227 122 349 65.0% 64 42 106 60.4% 59 25 84 70.2% 48 34 82 58.5% — 42 67 109 38.5% 135 98 233 57.9% 0 8 8 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Todd Martin Jose Acasuso
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1518 102.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1537 125.9 -1.22 -2.64 0.825 46.8% -26 +67 — 42.0% -0.64 4–3 (57%) 4–5 (44%) 102.0 -0.39
19 1990 1516 114.1 — — — — +28 — — 40.0% 0.00 2–0 0–4 (0%) — +0.50 2002 1667 134.9 -0.20 -0.36 0.990 49.8% -189 +134 — 52.8% +0.12 3–4 (43%) 7–3 (70%) 103.5 +1.97
20 1991 1652 125.4 — — — — -62 -40 -7 55.8% +0.56 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) 100.0 +1.12 2003 1614 125.8 -0.09 -3.06 0.865 47.6% -127 +114 — 38.0% -0.53 5–5 (50%) 1–7 (13%) 95.5 -0.45
21 1992 1724 141.4 — — — — -19 -110 -46 55.8% +0.54 4–9 (31%) 8–8 (50%) 97.1 +0.21 2004 1686 136.4 +0.65 -0.32 1.010 50.2% -228 +141 — 52.6% -0.08 4–4 (50%) 9–3 (75%) 103.8 -0.74
22 1993 1887 155.8 — — — — -16 -193 -64 62.4% +0.78 10–9 (53%) 16–17 (48%) 100.9 -0.69 2005 1725 137.2 +2.49 -0.53 1.034 50.4% -82 +16 — 48.8% -0.07 7–8 (47%) 12–10 (55%) 102.3 +0.52
23 1994 1945 157.2 — — — — -18 -177 +80 64.0% +0.94 19–8 (70%) 26–17 (60%) 107.1 -1.38 2006 1711 145.1 +2.75 +0.79 1.124 52.1% -91 +141 — 56.3% +0.60 9–8 (53%) 8–12 (40%) 98.7 +2.36
24 1995 1913 152.5 — — — — +27 -141 +46 62.5% +0.71 11–4 (73%) 20–12 (63%) 108.7 -0.11 2007 1686 138.1 -0.78 +1.04 1.023 50.3% -59 +104 — 52.5% +0.01 1–4 (20%) 7–5 (58%) 98.6 +0.97
25 1996 1923 161.1 — — — — +26 -122 +82 66.3% +1.07 11–10 (52%) 15–12 (56%) 98.3 -1.56 2008 1697 140.0 -1.63 +0.93 0.973 49.5% -55 +78 — 50.9% +0.17 8–6 (57%) 5–11 (31%) 98.5 +1.79
26 1997 1914 152.5 — — — — +27 — — 63.3% +0.53 2–4 (33%) 6–3 (67%) 97.1 -1.34 2009 1733 148.1 0.00 -1.51 0.931 48.9% -59 +71 — 53.8% +0.22 5–3 (63%) 6–8 (43%) 101.0 -0.56
27 1998 1999 161.9 — — — — +10 -105 -16 64.0% +0.82 12–7 (63%) 19–11 (63%) 106.8 -4.34 2010 1668 108.9 -1.74 -1.64 1.122 51.9% — — — 37.5% 0.00 — 0–1 — +0.71
28 1999 1914 156.7 — — — — +32 +22 +54 63.2% +0.70 14–10 (58%) 26–16 (62%) 99.2 -0.18 2011 1657 116.1 +0.80 +1.94 1.062 50.7% — +93 — 57.1% +1.00 1–0 0–1 — -0.36
29 2000 1862 141.9 — — — — +57 +9 +96 54.5% +0.48 3–4 (43%) 7–10 (41%) 93.4 -0.87 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2001 1816 132.4 — — — — +63 -59 +147 51.3% -0.17 6–3 (67%) 6–5 (55%) 100.3 -0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 1786 147.1 — — — — +51 -34 +125 58.3% +0.40 6–6 (50%) 14–10 (58%) 98.5 -2.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2003 1842 133.5 +2.69 +0.10 1.096 51.8% +8 -108 +98 61.8% +0.46 1–5 (17%) 9–6 (60%) 94.9 -0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2004 1688 130.3 +1.82 +0.03 1.029 50.4% +23 +23 +195 43.8% -0.21 5–6 (45%) 10–9 (53%) 98.0 -1.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2064 158.1 +2.25 +0.06 1.062 51.1% +15 -99 +51 60.5% +0.64 108–88 (55%) 185–143 (56%) 101.2 -2.06 — 1830 143.9 +0.39 -0.37 0.991 49.8% -86 +97 — 50.5% +0.05 47–45 (51%) 59–66 (47%) 101.2 +1.62

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.