H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Todd Martin vs Juan Ignacio Chela H2H: 0-1
Juan Ignacio Chela holds a 1–0 lead over Todd Martin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Juan Ignacio Chela leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Juan Ignacio Chela won the 2000 Roland Garros first round 4-6 6-3 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 56
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 46
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2000* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Juan Ignacio Chela | 4-6 6-3 6-4 6-4 | Todd Martin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Todd Martin | #145 | #4 | 2,969 | 2,063 | 398 | 222 | 64.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Juan Ignacio Chela | #967 | #15 | 1,510 | 1,909 | 306 | 268 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Todd Martin | Juan Ignacio Chela | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1990 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #269 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #134 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #63 | 1,540 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1992 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #87 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1993 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #13 | 1,886 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 44–27 | 62.0% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1994 | 50–19 | 72.5% | #10 | 1,943 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #38 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1995 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #18 | 1,912 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #26 | 1,735 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1996 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #12 | 1,926 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #39 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1997 | 13–7 | 65.0% | #81 | 1,914 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #33 | 1,721 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1998 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #16 | 1,998 | 0 | 7 | 2007 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #20 | 1,796 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1999 | 42–17 | 71.2% | #7 | 1,914 | 0 | 8 | 2008 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #140 | 1,737 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2000 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #55 | 1,887 | 0 | 8 | 2009 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #73 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2001 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #57 | 1,823 | 0 | 8 | 2010 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #38 | 1,835 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2002 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #47 | 1,788 | 0 | 8 | 2011 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #29 | 1,737 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 2003 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #68 | 1,828 | 0 | 8 | 2012 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #176 | 1,634 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | 2004 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #145 | 1,684 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |