H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Todd Martin vs Mats Wilander H2H: 4-1

Todd Martin holds a 4–1 lead over Mats Wilander in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Todd Martin leads 3–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Todd Martin won the 1996 Roland Garros second round 6-4 7-6(5) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Todd Martin
USA Age 56 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Mats Wilander
SWE Age 61 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 31, 1996* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Todd Martin #18 6-4 7-6(5) 6-2 Mats Wilander #75 Match data
Sep 1, 1995* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Todd Martin #16 6-4 6-2 7-5 Mats Wilander #48 Match data
Aug 15, 1994 Indianapolis ATP 250 R32 Hard Mats Wilander #138 6-4 1-6 6-3 Todd Martin #9 Match data
May 7, 1994* Pinehurst ATP 250 SF Clay Todd Martin #9 6-3 2-6 6-4 Mats Wilander #191 Match data
Apr 30, 1994* Atlanta ATP 250 QF Clay Todd Martin #9 6-3 7-6(3) Mats Wilander #203 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Todd Martin #145 #4 2,969 2,063 398 222 64.2% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Mats Wilander #1,354 #1 1,075 2,262 526 203 72.2% 7 6 0 0 20 33

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Todd Martin Mats Wilander
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1980 1–4 20.0% #283 1,496 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1981 13–10 56.5% #73 1,662 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1982 56–16 77.8% #8 2,020 1 4
18 — — — — — — — 1983 71–11 86.6% #4 2,246 2 13
19 1990 3–4 42.9% #269 1,508 0 0 1984 49–12 80.3% #4 2,177 3 16
20 1991 10–8 55.6% #134 1,648 0 0 1985 65–17 79.3% #3 2,108 4 19
21 1992 22–19 53.7% #87 1,724 0 0 1986 46–13 78.0% #3 2,056 4 21
22 1993 45–23 66.2% #13 1,886 0 1 1987 65–17 79.3% #3 2,082 4 26
23 1994 50–19 72.5% #10 1,943 0 3 1988 51–9 85.0% #1 2,152 7 32
24 1995 45–21 68.2% #18 1,912 0 4 1989 31–15 67.4% #12 1,922 7 32
25 1996 49–20 71.0% #12 1,926 0 5 1990 21–13 61.8% #41 1,894 7 33
26 1997 13–7 65.0% #81 1,914 0 5 1991 9–10 47.4% #159 1,767 7 33
27 1998 43–20 68.3% #16 1,998 0 7 — — — — — — —
28 1999 42–17 71.2% #7 1,914 0 8 1993 3–7 30.0% #330 1,695 7 33
29 2000 14–11 56.0% #55 1,887 0 8 1994 17–20 45.9% #129 1,652 7 33
30 2001 13–11 54.2% #57 1,823 0 8 1995 21–18 53.8% #46 1,766 7 33
31 2002 24–16 60.0% #47 1,788 0 8 1996 7–11 38.9% #196 1,679 7 33
32 2003 15–11 57.7% #68 1,828 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2004 10–15 40.0% #145 1,684 0 8 — — — — — — —