H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Todd Martin vs Michael Llodra H2H: 1-0
Todd Martin holds a 1–0 lead over Michael Llodra in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Todd Martin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Todd Martin won the 2002 Adelaide fourth round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 56
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 46
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2002* | Adelaide | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Todd Martin | 7-5 6-4 | Michael Llodra | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Todd Martin | #145 | #4 | 2,969 | 2,063 | 398 | 222 | 64.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Michael Llodra | #631 | #21 | 1,575 | 1,901 | 182 | 215 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Todd Martin | Michael Llodra | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1990 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #269 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1991 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #134 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #159 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #87 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #89 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #13 | 1,886 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #104 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 50–19 | 72.5% | #10 | 1,943 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #173 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #18 | 1,912 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #41 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1996 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #12 | 1,926 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1997 | 13–7 | 65.0% | #81 | 1,914 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1998 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #16 | 1,998 | 0 | 7 | 2007 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #93 | 1,640 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1999 | 42–17 | 71.2% | #7 | 1,914 | 0 | 8 | 2008 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #40 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2000 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #55 | 1,887 | 0 | 8 | 2009 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #67 | 1,738 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2001 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #57 | 1,823 | 0 | 8 | 2010 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #23 | 1,879 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2002 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #47 | 1,788 | 0 | 8 | 2011 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #47 | 1,776 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 2003 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #68 | 1,828 | 0 | 8 | 2012 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #53 | 1,842 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 2004 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #145 | 1,684 | 0 | 8 | 2013 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #105 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #269 | 1,688 | 0 | 5 |