H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Todd Martin vs Nicolas Kiefer H2H: 2-4

Nicolas Kiefer holds a 4–2 lead over Todd Martin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Kiefer leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Todd Martin leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Nicolas Kiefer won the 2001 Cincinnati Masters third round 6-1 4-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Todd Martin
USA Age 56 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main draw meetings
Nicolas Kiefer
GER Age 49 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 9, 2001* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Nicolas Kiefer #26 6-1 4-6 6-2 Todd Martin #29 Match data
May 17, 2001* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Nicolas Kiefer #32 6-3 7-5 Todd Martin #33 Match data
Aug 9, 2000* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Todd Martin #34 6-2 6-2 Nicolas Kiefer #14 Match data
Aug 2, 2000* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Nicolas Kiefer #12 6-1 7-5 Todd Martin #30 Match data
Nov 22, 1999 Tour Finals ATP Finals RR Hard Nicolas Kiefer #6 6-3 6-2 Todd Martin #7 Match data
Oct 15, 1998* Vienna ATP 250 R32 Carpet Todd Martin #29 4-6 6-3 6-4 Nicolas Kiefer #33 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Todd Martin #145 #4 2,969 2,063 398 222 64.2% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Nicolas Kiefer #720 #4 2,447 1,984 343 252 57.6% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Todd Martin Nicolas Kiefer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% #1198 1,489 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1995 3–3 50.0% #206 1,527 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1996 7–9 43.8% #128 1,562 0 0
19 1990 3–4 42.9% #269 1,508 0 0 1997 26–16 61.9% #32 1,798 0 1
20 1991 10–8 55.6% #134 1,648 0 0 1998 31–25 55.4% #35 1,790 0 1
21 1992 22–19 53.7% #87 1,724 0 0 1999 53–21 71.6% #6 1,921 0 4
22 1993 45–23 66.2% #13 1,886 0 1 2000 30–15 66.7% #20 1,921 0 6
23 1994 50–19 72.5% #10 1,943 0 3 2001 26–25 51.0% #42 1,766 0 6
24 1995 45–21 68.2% #18 1,912 0 4 2002 19–24 44.2% #72 1,718 0 6
25 1996 49–20 71.0% #12 1,926 0 5 2003 19–17 52.8% #58 1,727 0 6
26 1997 13–7 65.0% #81 1,914 0 5 2004 32–19 62.7% #21 1,897 0 6
27 1998 43–20 68.3% #16 1,998 0 7 2005 31–22 58.5% #22 1,854 0 6
28 1999 42–17 71.2% #7 1,914 0 8 2006 14–8 63.6% #48 1,843 0 6
29 2000 14–11 56.0% #55 1,887 0 8 2007 19–12 61.3% #49 1,893 0 6
30 2001 13–11 54.2% #57 1,823 0 8 2008 20–16 55.6% #38 1,876 0 6
31 2002 24–16 60.0% #47 1,788 0 8 2009 12–16 42.9% #116 1,757 0 6
32 2003 15–11 57.7% #68 1,828 0 8 2010 1–3 25.0% #722 1,717 0 6
33 2004 10–15 40.0% #145 1,684 0 8 — — — — — — —