H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Todd Martin vs Pablo Arraya H2H: 1-0
Todd Martin holds a 1–0 lead over Pablo Arraya in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Todd Martin leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Todd Martin won the 1992 Charlotte third round 7-6(0) 3-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 56
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
PER
Age 64
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 1992* | Charlotte | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Todd Martin | 7-6(0) 3-6 6-1 | Pablo Arraya | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Todd Martin | #145 | #4 | 2,969 | 2,063 | 398 | 222 | 64.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Pablo Arraya | #1,187 | #29 | 348 | 1,821 | 168 | 168 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Todd Martin | Pablo Arraya | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #309 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #269 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #91 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #134 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #37 | 1,750 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #87 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #39 | 1,806 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1993 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #13 | 1,886 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1994 | 50–19 | 72.5% | #10 | 1,943 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #88 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1995 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #18 | 1,912 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #60 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1996 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #12 | 1,926 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #132 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1997 | 13–7 | 65.0% | #81 | 1,914 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #169 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1998 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #16 | 1,998 | 0 | 7 | 1989 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #312 | 1,488 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1999 | 42–17 | 71.2% | #7 | 1,914 | 0 | 8 | 1990 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #157 | 1,501 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2000 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #55 | 1,887 | 0 | 8 | 1991 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #121 | 1,545 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2001 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #57 | 1,823 | 0 | 8 | 1992 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #174 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2002 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #47 | 1,788 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2003 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #68 | 1,828 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2004 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #145 | 1,684 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |