H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Todd Martin vs Patrik Kuhnen H2H: 2-0

Todd Martin holds a 2–0 lead over Patrik Kuhnen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Todd Martin leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Todd Martin won the 1994 Wimbledon round of 64 6-2 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Todd Martin
USA Age 56 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Patrik Kuhnen
GER Age 60 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Todd Martin #9 6-2 6-2 6-4 Patrik Kuhnen #134 Match data Jun 24, 1994* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Todd Martin #93 6-3 6-3 3-6 6-4 Patrik Kuhnen #104 Match data Sep 4, 1992* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Todd Martin #145 #4 2,969 2,064 398 223 64.1% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Patrik Kuhnen #1,341 #43 574 1,789 126 151 45.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Todd Martin Patrik Kuhnen
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1990 3–4 42.9% #269 1,515 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1991 10–8 55.6% #134 1,652 0 0 1986 1–3 25.0% #170 1,508 0 0
21 1992 22–19 53.7% #87 1,724 0 0 1987 10–12 45.5% #83 1,582 0 0
22 1993 45–23 66.2% #13 1,886 0 1 1988 16–16 50.0% #61 1,701 0 0
23 1994 50–19 72.5% #10 1,945 0 3 1989 15–12 55.6% #69 1,744 0 0
24 1995 45–21 68.2% #18 1,913 0 4 1990 23–22 51.1% #82 1,675 0 0
25 1996 49–20 71.0% #12 1,923 0 5 1991 21–24 46.7% #86 1,661 0 0
26 1997 13–7 65.0% #81 1,913 0 5 1992 16–23 41.0% #89 1,656 0 0
27 1998 43–20 68.3% #16 1,998 0 7 1993 13–22 37.1% #119 1,631 0 0
28 1999 42–17 71.2% #7 1,914 0 8 1994 6–8 42.9% #189 1,633 0 0
29 2000 14–12 53.8% #55 1,862 0 8 1995 4–7 36.4% #187 1,614 0 0
30 2001 13–11 54.2% #57 1,816 0 8 1996 1–2 33.3% #504 1,609 0 0
31 2002 24–16 60.0% #47 1,785 0 8 — — — — — — —
32 2003 15–11 57.7% #68 1,842 0 8 — — — — — — —
33 2004 10–15 40.0% #145 1,688 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Todd Martin Patrik Kuhnen
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1990 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1991 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1986 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1992 12 10 22 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1987 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
22 1993 21 12 33 63.6% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 2 10 80.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1988 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 7 5 12 58.3%
23 1994 22 8 30 73.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 10 1 11 90.9% 8 6 14 57.1% 1989 6 3 9 66.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
24 1995 25 10 35 71.4% 7 4 11 63.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 1990 13 13 26 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
25 1996 29 10 39 74.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 7 4 11 63.6% 1991 11 10 21 52.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 7 11 36.4%
26 1997 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 1992 11 12 23 47.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5%
27 1998 26 12 38 68.4% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1993 4 9 13 30.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 6 12 50.0%
28 1999 30 11 41 73.2% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1994 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
29 2000 11 7 18 61.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
30 2001 8 6 14 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 1996 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
31 2002 17 11 28 60.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2003 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2004 5 9 14 35.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 227 122 349 65.0% 64 42 106 60.4% 59 25 84 70.2% 48 34 82 58.5% — 55 64 119 46.2% 17 27 44 38.6% 19 23 42 45.2% 35 37 72 48.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Todd Martin Patrik Kuhnen
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1990 1516 114.1 — — — — +28 — — 40.0% 0.00 2–0 0–4 (0%) — +0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1991 1652 125.4 — — — — -62 -40 -7 55.8% +0.56 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) 100.0 +1.12 1986 1508 110.1 — — — — +42 — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 3–0 (100%) — -0.37
21 1992 1724 141.4 — — — — -19 -110 -46 55.8% +0.54 4–9 (31%) 8–8 (50%) 97.1 +0.21 1987 1583 123.1 — — — — +5 -20 -85 43.9% -0.12 5–5 (50%) 2–6 (25%) 99.3 +0.03
22 1993 1887 155.8 — — — — -16 -193 -64 62.4% +0.78 10–9 (53%) 16–17 (48%) 100.9 -0.69 1988 1701 124.9 — — — — -76 -125 -46 53.4% +0.05 5–5 (50%) 8–7 (53%) 104.7 +1.00
23 1994 1945 157.2 — — — — -18 -177 +80 64.0% +0.94 19–8 (70%) 26–17 (60%) 107.1 -1.38 1989 1745 137.3 — — — — -48 -105 -91 51.5% +0.12 6–2 (75%) 6–5 (55%) 105.7 -0.67
24 1995 1913 152.5 — — — — +27 -141 +46 62.5% +0.71 11–4 (73%) 20–12 (63%) 108.7 -0.11 1990 1675 136.1 — — — — +17 +15 -18 48.6% -0.14 7–5 (58%) 11–5 (69%) 104.8 -0.51
25 1996 1923 161.1 — — — — +26 -122 +82 66.3% +1.07 11–10 (52%) 15–12 (56%) 98.3 -1.56 1991 1662 134.0 +0.64 -0.43 1.013 50.2% +11 -14 +54 50.9% +0.10 3–11 (21%) 3–8 (27%) 88.6 +0.13
26 1997 1914 152.5 — — — — +27 — — 63.3% +0.53 2–4 (33%) 6–3 (67%) 97.1 -1.34 1992 1657 134.5 +0.21 -2.10 0.908 48.4% +18 — +40 43.8% -0.31 4–7 (36%) 9–10 (47%) 99.0 -0.13
27 1998 1999 161.9 — — — — +10 -105 -16 64.0% +0.82 12–7 (63%) 19–11 (63%) 106.8 -4.34 1993 1632 125.3 -0.07 -2.17 0.909 48.4% +13 -44 +14 42.7% -0.49 5–8 (38%) 8–8 (50%) 98.6 +0.06
28 1999 1914 156.7 — — — — +32 +22 +54 63.2% +0.70 14–10 (58%) 26–16 (62%) 99.2 -0.18 1994 1633 115.0 -0.25 -1.36 0.970 48.8% -15 — — 40.5% -0.76 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 102.8 +0.57
29 2000 1862 141.9 — — — — +57 +9 +96 54.5% +0.48 3–4 (43%) 7–10 (41%) 93.4 -0.87 1995 1615 117.6 -0.55 -2.86 0.797 46.5% +14 — — 37.0% -0.70 3–2 (60%) 2–0 — +0.15
30 2001 1816 132.4 — — — — +63 -59 +147 51.3% -0.17 6–3 (67%) 6–5 (55%) 100.3 -0.33 1996 1609 105.0 -0.52 -3.09 0.820 48.5% — — — 28.6% -1.14 1–0 0–1 — -0.02
31 2002 1786 147.1 — — — — +51 -34 +125 58.3% +0.40 6–6 (50%) 14–10 (58%) 98.5 -2.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2003 1842 133.5 +2.69 +0.10 1.096 51.8% +8 -108 +98 61.8% +0.46 1–5 (17%) 9–6 (60%) 94.9 -0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2004 1688 130.3 +1.82 +0.03 1.029 50.4% +23 +23 +195 43.8% -0.21 5–6 (45%) 10–9 (53%) 98.0 -1.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2064 158.1 +2.25 +0.06 1.062 51.1% +15 -99 +51 60.5% +0.64 108–88 (55%) 185–143 (56%) 101.2 -2.06 — 1789 136.0 +0.15 -1.61 0.935 48.8% -1 -51 -18 46.8% -0.21 41–47 (47%) 54–51 (51%) 103.1 +0.09

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.