H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Todd Martin vs Renzo Furlan H2H: 3-0

Todd Martin holds a 3–0 lead over Renzo Furlan in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Todd Martin leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Todd Martin won the 1996 Canadian Open round of 32 7-6(3) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Todd Martin
USA Age 56 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main-draw meetings
Renzo Furlan
ITA Age 56 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Todd Martin #13 7-6(3) 6-3 Renzo Furlan #33 Match data Aug 22, 1996* R32 Canadian Open Masters 1000 Hard
Todd Martin #18 7-6(1) 6-4 6-2 Renzo Furlan #26 Match data Jun 30, 1996* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Todd Martin #18 6-3 6-2 Renzo Furlan #21 Match data Mar 21, 1996* R32 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Todd Martin #145 #4 2,969 2,064 398 223 64.1% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Renzo Furlan #1,479 #19 1,235 1,864 214 233 47.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Todd Martin Renzo Furlan
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1990 3–4 42.9% #269 1,515 0 0 1989 3–5 37.5% #222 1,500 0 0
20 1991 10–8 55.6% #134 1,652 0 0 1990 9–8 52.9% #77 1,597 0 0
21 1992 22–19 53.7% #87 1,724 0 0 1991 22–26 45.8% #52 1,664 0 0
22 1993 45–23 66.2% #13 1,886 0 1 1992 26–29 47.3% #53 1,682 0 0
23 1994 50–19 72.5% #10 1,945 0 3 1993 26–28 48.1% #72 1,682 0 0
24 1995 45–21 68.2% #18 1,913 0 4 1994 30–27 52.6% #41 1,665 0 2
25 1996 49–20 71.0% #12 1,923 0 5 1995 37–31 54.4% #29 1,729 0 2
26 1997 13–7 65.0% #81 1,913 0 5 1996 32–27 54.2% #40 1,706 0 2
27 1998 43–20 68.3% #16 1,998 0 7 1997 18–27 40.0% #100 1,581 0 2
28 1999 42–17 71.2% #7 1,914 0 8 1998 2–8 20.0% #144 1,514 0 2
29 2000 14–12 53.8% #55 1,862 0 8 1999 3–5 37.5% #225 1,542 0 2
30 2001 13–11 54.2% #57 1,816 0 8 2000 3–4 42.9% #236 1,569 0 2
31 2002 24–16 60.0% #47 1,785 0 8 2001 1–1 50.0% #190 1,554 0 2
32 2003 15–11 57.7% #68 1,842 0 8 2002 1–3 25.0% #186 1,540 0 2
33 2004 10–15 40.0% #145 1,688 0 8 2003 1–4 20.0% #194 1,547 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Todd Martin Renzo Furlan
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1990 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1989 — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
20 1991 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1990 — — — — 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — — — — —
21 1992 12 10 22 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1991 1 7 8 12.5% 20 17 37 54.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1993 21 12 33 63.6% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 2 10 80.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1992 0 7 7 0.0% 25 20 45 55.6% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1994 22 8 30 73.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 10 1 11 90.9% 8 6 14 57.1% 1993 2 6 8 25.0% 23 21 44 52.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1995 25 10 35 71.4% 7 4 11 63.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 1994 10 7 17 58.8% 17 16 33 51.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 1996 29 10 39 74.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 7 4 11 63.6% 1995 17 10 27 63.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 9 9 18 50.0%
26 1997 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 1996 17 13 30 56.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2%
27 1998 26 12 38 68.4% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1997 4 10 14 28.6% 6 11 17 35.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
28 1999 30 11 41 73.2% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
29 2000 11 7 18 61.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1999 — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
30 2001 8 6 14 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2000 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
31 2002 17 11 28 60.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2001 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2003 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2002 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2004 5 9 14 35.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2003 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 227 122 349 65.0% 64 42 106 60.4% 59 25 84 70.2% 48 34 82 58.5% — 55 68 123 44.7% 127 128 255 49.8% 3 6 9 33.3% 29 31 60 48.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 49/51 of Todd Martin's and 351/422 of Renzo Furlan's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Todd Martin Renzo Furlan
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 43/48 1.4 1.2 62.8% 62.2% 48.8% 50.4% 49.3% 57.0% 42.8%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 44/55 1.9 0.9 62.9% 62.7% 49.8% 53.1% 47.2% 58.0% 43.1%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 46/54 2.4 1.5 58.4% 66.3% 50.5% 53.8% 44.3% 59.5% 39.9%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 49/57 2.9 1.5 57.4% 67.6% 49.6% 48.4% 49.0% 59.8% 41.8%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 57/68 3.4 1.9 57.4% 69.3% 50.5% 56.3% 46.0% 61.1% 38.3%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 46/59 3.9 1.7 61.2% 69.4% 51.0% 57.8% 42.8% 62.2% 38.8%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 36/45 5.5 3.3 53.3% 74.5% 49.7% 60.0% 40.7% 62.5% 36.8%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 7/10 7.0 3.3 50.2% 71.6% 43.1% 58.8% 35.2% 57.1% 32.8%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 6/8 2.2 2.7 55.0% 60.1% 37.9% 53.7% 26.4% 50.3% 33.8%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 6/7 3.8 2.2 56.0% 65.0% 54.5% 66.4% 42.1% 60.2% 33.3%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 2/2 2.0 2.0 49.9% 73.7% 46.4% 36.7% 41.7% 60.0% 35.2%
32 2003 24/26 10.0 5.2 58.9% 77.1% 51.2% 63.9% 49.9% 66.4% 36.8% 2002 4/4 1.5 2.8 57.6% 66.1% 50.3% 50.7% 69.8% 59.3% 33.1%
33 2004 25/25 10.5 4.1 62.5% 75.3% 49.7% 57.7% 31.7% 65.7% 35.3% 2003 5/5 3.4 1.2 60.8% 64.4% 57.8% 49.2% 37.6% 61.8% 37.5%
Career — 49/621 10.3 4.6 60.8% 76.2% 50.4% 60.7% 40.6% 66.1% 36.0% — 351/447 3.1 1.7 58.8% 67.2% 49.8% 54.2% 45.3% 59.8% 39.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Todd Martin Renzo Furlan
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1990 1516 114.1 — — — — +28 — — 40.0% 0.00 2–0 0–4 (0%) — +0.50 1989 1501 106.7 — — — — — +10 — 35.0% -0.45 2–0 0–3 (0%) — +0.66
20 1991 1652 125.4 — — — — -62 -40 -7 55.8% +0.56 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) 100.0 +1.12 1990 1598 130.3 — — — — — +44 — 50.0% -0.03 3–1 (75%) 2–3 (40%) 102.7 -0.03
21 1992 1724 141.4 — — — — -19 -110 -46 55.8% +0.54 4–9 (31%) 8–8 (50%) 97.1 +0.21 1991 1664 137.7 -2.73 +1.94 0.994 49.8% -177 +91 — 47.1% -0.41 8–12 (40%) 12–4 (75%) 105.4 +0.30
22 1993 1887 155.8 — — — — -16 -193 -64 62.4% +0.78 10–9 (53%) 16–17 (48%) 100.9 -0.69 1992 1682 140.0 -1.77 +2.85 1.025 50.4% -235 +91 — 47.4% +0.01 8–10 (44%) 3–8 (27%) 96.1 -0.67
23 1994 1945 157.2 — — — — -18 -177 +80 64.0% +0.94 19–8 (70%) 26–17 (60%) 107.1 -1.38 1993 1683 138.8 -0.24 +0.57 0.985 49.6% -226 +82 — 48.0% -0.09 7–8 (47%) 7–7 (50%) 98.6 +0.10
24 1995 1913 152.5 — — — — +27 -141 +46 62.5% +0.71 11–4 (73%) 20–12 (63%) 108.7 -0.11 1994 1665 140.9 -0.31 +2.54 1.038 50.5% -28 +39 — 48.9% +0.01 13–10 (57%) 11–9 (55%) 105.7 +0.67
25 1996 1923 161.1 — — — — +26 -122 +82 66.3% +1.07 11–10 (52%) 15–12 (56%) 98.3 -1.56 1995 1729 142.6 -0.32 +0.37 0.982 49.7% +21 -5 — 51.8% +0.17 14–3 (82%) 9–14 (39%) 105.7 +0.88
26 1997 1914 152.5 — — — — +27 — — 63.3% +0.53 2–4 (33%) 6–3 (67%) 97.1 -1.34 1996 1706 139.0 +0.16 +1.18 1.029 50.3% -16 +54 -123 51.0% +0.01 14–7 (67%) 11–11 (50%) 105.1 -0.21
27 1998 1999 161.9 — — — — +10 -105 -16 64.0% +0.82 12–7 (63%) 19–11 (63%) 106.8 -4.34 1997 1582 130.5 +0.90 -1.60 0.981 49.4% +41 +103 — 42.6% -0.40 9–10 (47%) 14–12 (54%) 100.5 +1.02
28 1999 1914 156.7 — — — — +32 +22 +54 63.2% +0.70 14–10 (58%) 26–16 (62%) 99.2 -0.18 1998 1514 109.9 -1.66 -1.48 0.763 46.0% +69 +109 — 32.1% -1.21 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — +0.35
29 2000 1862 141.9 — — — — +57 +9 +96 54.5% +0.48 3–4 (43%) 7–10 (41%) 93.4 -0.87 1999 1542 115.4 -3.93 -1.08 0.680 42.1% — +87 — 33.3% -1.83 2–0 3–0 (100%) — -0.45
30 2001 1816 132.4 — — — — +63 -59 +147 51.3% -0.17 6–3 (67%) 6–5 (55%) 100.3 -0.33 2000 1569 111.4 -1.39 -1.97 0.838 47.4% +18 +59 — 41.2% -0.94 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.23
31 2002 1786 147.1 — — — — +51 -34 +125 58.3% +0.40 6–6 (50%) 14–10 (58%) 98.5 -2.19 2001 1555 106.0 -2.11 +1.56 0.881 47.7% — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — +0.18
32 2003 1842 133.5 +2.69 +0.10 1.096 51.8% +8 -108 +98 61.8% +0.46 1–5 (17%) 9–6 (60%) 94.9 -0.41 2002 1540 109.9 -1.86 -0.38 0.813 46.7% — — — 33.3% -0.56 0–1 1–1 — +0.32
33 2004 1688 130.3 +1.82 +0.03 1.029 50.4% +23 +23 +195 43.8% -0.21 5–6 (45%) 10–9 (53%) 98.0 -1.17 2003 1548 103.2 -1.68 -0.29 0.984 49.5% +59 — — 10.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.07
Career — 2064 158.1 +2.25 +0.06 1.062 51.1% +15 -99 +51 60.5% +0.64 108–88 (55%) 185–143 (56%) 101.2 -2.06 — 1865 140.8 -0.75 +0.99 0.987 49.7% -29 +67 -123 47.0% -0.18 84–67 (56%) 74–76 (49%) 104.6 +0.77

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.