H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Todd Martin vs Vincent Spadea H2H: 3-1
Todd Martin holds a 3–1 lead over Vincent Spadea in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Todd Martin leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Vincent Spadea won the 2004 Auckland third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 56
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2004* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Vincent Spadea | 6-3 6-4 | Todd Martin | Match data |
| Aug 30, 2000* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Todd Martin | 6-4 6-1 1-6 6-2 | Vincent Spadea | Match data |
| Aug 7, 1999* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Todd Martin | 6-3 7-6(3) | Vincent Spadea | Match data |
| Jan 22, 1995* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Todd Martin | 6-3 6-1 6-2 | Vincent Spadea | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Todd Martin | #145 | #4 | 2,969 | 2,063 | 398 | 222 | 64.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Vincent Spadea | #1,474 | #18 | 1,629 | 1,876 | 310 | 348 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Todd Martin | Vincent Spadea | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1990 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #269 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #303 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #134 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #75 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #87 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #81 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #13 | 1,886 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #54 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 50–19 | 72.5% | #10 | 1,943 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #88 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #18 | 1,912 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #42 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #12 | 1,926 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #20 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 13–7 | 65.0% | #81 | 1,914 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 3–23 | 11.5% | #213 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #16 | 1,998 | 0 | 7 | 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #125 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 42–17 | 71.2% | #7 | 1,914 | 0 | 8 | 2002 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #67 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #55 | 1,887 | 0 | 8 | 2003 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #29 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #57 | 1,823 | 0 | 8 | 2004 | 39–25 | 60.9% | #20 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 2002 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #47 | 1,788 | 0 | 8 | 2005 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #75 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 |
| 2003 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #68 | 1,828 | 0 | 8 | 2006 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #73 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| 2004 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #145 | 1,684 | 0 | 8 | 2007 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #77 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #76 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #295 | 1,526 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1517 | 1,480 | 0 | 1 |