H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Todd Martin vs Wayne Arthurs H2H: 2-0

Todd Martin holds a 2–0 lead over Wayne Arthurs in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Todd Martin leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Todd Martin won the 2002 Indian Wells Open round of 64 6-1 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Todd Martin
USA Age 56 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Wayne Arthurs
AUS Age 55 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Todd Martin #64 6-1 7-6(4) Wayne Arthurs #97 Match data Mar 13, 2002* R64 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Todd Martin #21 6-4 6-3 Wayne Arthurs #168 Match data Nov 13, 1998* R16 Stockholm Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Todd Martin #145 #4 2,969 2,064 398 223 64.1% 0 0 0 3 5 8
Wayne Arthurs #368 #44 833 1,781 123 153 44.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Todd Martin Wayne Arthurs
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1990 3–4 42.9% #269 1,515 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1991 10–8 55.6% #134 1,652 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1992 22–19 53.7% #87 1,724 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1993 45–23 66.2% #13 1,886 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 1994 50–19 72.5% #10 1,945 0 3 — — — — — — —
24 1995 45–21 68.2% #18 1,913 0 4 — — — — — — —
25 1996 49–20 71.0% #12 1,923 0 5 1996 1–2 33.3% #561 1,499 0 0
26 1997 13–7 65.0% #81 1,913 0 5 — — — — — — —
27 1998 43–20 68.3% #16 1,998 0 7 1998 4–3 57.1% #187 1,568 0 0
28 1999 42–17 71.2% #7 1,914 0 8 1999 12–11 52.2% #105 1,651 0 0
29 2000 14–12 53.8% #55 1,862 0 8 2000 13–18 41.9% #83 1,700 0 0
30 2001 13–11 54.2% #57 1,816 0 8 2001 19–23 45.2% #77 1,637 0 0
31 2002 24–16 60.0% #47 1,785 0 8 2002 23–24 48.9% #52 1,701 0 0
32 2003 15–11 57.7% #68 1,842 0 8 2003 11–22 33.3% #117 1,612 0 0
33 2004 10–15 40.0% #145 1,688 0 8 2004 13–20 39.4% #101 1,557 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2005 17–18 48.6% #97 1,621 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 2006 6–10 37.5% #161 1,625 0 1
36 — — — — — — — 2007 4–2 66.7% #244 1,667 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Todd Martin Wayne Arthurs
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1990 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1991 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1992 12 10 22 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1993 21 12 33 63.6% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 2 10 80.0% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1994 22 8 30 73.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 10 1 11 90.9% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1995 25 10 35 71.4% 7 4 11 63.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1996 29 10 39 74.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 7 4 11 63.6% 1996 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 1997 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1998 26 12 38 68.4% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1998 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
28 1999 30 11 41 73.2% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1999 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — —
29 2000 11 7 18 61.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2000 9 10 19 47.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
30 2001 8 6 14 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2001 10 15 25 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2002 17 11 28 60.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2002 8 14 22 36.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 2003 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2003 7 11 18 38.9% 1 8 9 11.1% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
33 2004 5 9 14 35.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2004 11 14 25 44.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 11 10 21 52.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
Career — 227 122 349 65.0% 64 42 106 60.4% 59 25 84 70.2% 48 34 82 58.5% — 68 91 159 42.8% 18 31 49 36.7% 34 27 61 55.7% 3 4 7 42.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 49/51 of Todd Martin's and 246/276 of Wayne Arthurs's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Todd Martin Wayne Arthurs
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 2/3 7.5 3.5 49.9% 77.4% 60.4% 85.7% 12.5% 68.9% 34.5%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 6/7 18.2 6.0 53.2% 85.4% 55.7% 85.1% 29.4% 71.8% 31.2%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 21/23 17.0 4.1 56.2% 83.6% 58.5% 69.9% 26.0% 72.5% 29.2%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 22/31 15.3 6.6 53.1% 79.6% 56.9% 65.9% 32.0% 69.0% 27.2%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 37/42 15.4 5.2 53.2% 81.3% 56.6% 67.2% 41.3% 69.8% 31.6%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 38/47 16.4 5.3 58.2% 81.0% 53.9% 72.7% 30.8% 69.7% 31.0%
32 2003 24/26 10.0 5.2 58.9% 77.1% 51.2% 63.9% 49.9% 66.4% 36.8% 2003 33/33 14.6 4.6 57.5% 78.5% 53.1% 61.1% 28.5% 67.6% 26.5%
33 2004 25/25 10.5 4.1 62.5% 75.3% 49.7% 57.7% 31.7% 65.7% 35.3% 2004 30/33 14.8 5.5 56.2% 77.6% 53.2% 72.0% 35.2% 66.6% 29.2%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 35/35 15.2 5.1 55.3% 82.1% 55.4% 65.2% 24.4% 70.2% 30.0%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 16/16 19.3 4.8 56.9% 81.0% 53.9% 61.1% 31.8% 69.4% 28.8%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 6/6 18.3 5.8 59.3% 69.2% 46.3% 60.5% 33.6% 60.3% 27.2%
Career — 49/621 10.3 4.6 60.8% 76.2% 50.4% 60.7% 40.6% 66.1% 36.0% — 246/276 15.8 5.2 55.8% 80.3% 54.9% 67.7% 31.3% 69.1% 29.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Todd Martin Wayne Arthurs
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1990 1516 114.1 — — — — +28 — — 40.0% 0.00 2–0 0–4 (0%) — +0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1991 1652 125.4 — — — — -62 -40 -7 55.8% +0.56 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) — +1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1992 1724 141.4 — — — — -19 -110 -46 55.8% +0.54 4–9 (31%) 8–8 (50%) — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1993 1887 155.8 — — — — -16 -193 -64 62.4% +0.78 10–9 (53%) 16–17 (48%) — -0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1994 1945 157.2 — — — — -18 -177 +80 64.0% +0.94 19–8 (70%) 26–17 (60%) — -1.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1995 1913 152.5 — — — — +27 -141 +46 62.5% +0.71 11–4 (73%) 20–12 (63%) — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1996 1923 161.1 — — — — +26 -122 +82 66.3% +1.07 11–10 (52%) 15–12 (56%) — -1.56 1996 1500 104.7 -0.05 -0.39 1.112 51.2% — — — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — +0.13
26 1997 1914 152.5 — — — — +27 — — 63.3% +0.53 2–4 (33%) 6–3 (67%) — -1.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1998 1999 161.9 — — — — +10 -105 -16 64.0% +0.82 12–7 (63%) 19–11 (63%) — -4.34 1998 1568 120.7 +4.91 -3.72 1.108 51.8% +19 -8 — 52.6% 0.00 1–1 4–3 (57%) — -0.21
28 1999 1914 156.7 — — — — +32 +22 +54 63.2% +0.70 14–10 (58%) 26–16 (62%) — -0.18 1999 1652 125.2 +6.73 -4.44 1.062 50.8% -84 — +63 53.1% 0.00 3–3 (50%) 15–11 (58%) — +0.57
29 2000 1862 141.9 — — — — +57 +9 +96 54.5% +0.48 3–4 (43%) 7–10 (41%) — -0.87 2000 1700 134.3 +4.47 -5.48 0.877 48.7% -6 -214 +1 45.1% -0.21 2–5 (29%) 13–13 (50%) — -0.74
30 2001 1816 132.4 — — — — +63 -59 +147 51.3% -0.17 6–3 (67%) 6–5 (55%) — -0.33 2001 1637 134.5 +6.51 -3.67 1.047 50.8% -26 -53 +51 49.1% +0.21 7–9 (44%) 13–22 (37%) — -0.69
31 2002 1786 147.1 — — — — +51 -34 +125 58.3% +0.40 6–6 (50%) 14–10 (58%) — -2.19 2002 1701 132.5 +5.52 -5.12 1.021 50.5% -74 -103 +52 48.0% -0.03 12–9 (57%) 19–23 (45%) — +0.07
32 2003 1842 133.5 +2.69 +0.10 1.096 51.8% +8 -108 +98 61.8% +0.46 1–5 (17%) 9–6 (60%) — -0.41 2003 1612 126.7 +4.04 -7.94 0.817 47.1% +12 -96 +126 37.8% -0.76 5–4 (56%) 12–13 (48%) — -0.96
33 2004 1688 130.3 +1.82 +0.03 1.029 50.4% +23 +23 +195 43.8% -0.21 5–6 (45%) 10–9 (53%) — -1.17 2004 1557 126.0 +1.95 -5.15 0.873 48.5% +46 -38 +71 41.7% -0.36 4–8 (33%) 11–17 (39%) — +0.89
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1621 128.8 +5.90 -5.67 1.006 49.9% +11 -77 +14 46.6% -0.06 7–5 (58%) 13–18 (42%) — +0.19
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1625 120.7 +3.77 -4.98 0.940 49.0% -21 — +42 39.5% -0.53 3–3 (50%) 6–10 (38%) — +0.02
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1668 109.1 -1.63 -3.62 0.685 44.3% -80 — +91 60.0% +0.45 2–0 3–4 (43%) — +0.58
Career — 2064 158.1 +2.25 +0.06 1.062 51.1% +15 -99 +51 60.5% +0.64 108–88 (55%) 185–143 (56%) 101.2 -2.06 — 1781 134.2 +4.75 -5.22 0.952 49.4% -13 -84 +54 46.1% -0.16 46–48 (49%) 109–134 (45%) 100.5 -0.05

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.