H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Todd Nelson vs Jonathan Canter H2H: 0-2
Jonathan Canter holds a 2–0 lead over Todd Nelson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jonathan Canter leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jonathan Canter won the 1986 Stockholm second round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 65
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 1986* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Jonathan Canter | 6-4 6-4 | Todd Nelson | Match data |
| Sep 18, 1986* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jonathan Canter | 7-6 3-6 7-6 | Todd Nelson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Todd Nelson | #1,179 | #58 | 156 | 1,650 | 53 | 90 | 37.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jonathan Canter | #810 | #36 | 244 | 1,792 | 68 | 96 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Todd Nelson | Jonathan Canter | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #279 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #73 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #41 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1983 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #423 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #169 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1984 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #97 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1985 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #161 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #183 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1986 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #117 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #191 | 1,558 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1987 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #112 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #408 | 1,539 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1988 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #122 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #486 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #190 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #485 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #388 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #273 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1993 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #255 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |