H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Todd Nelson vs Mark Dickson H2H: 2-2
Todd Nelson and Mark Dickson are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Mark Dickson leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mark Dickson won the 1987 Stockholm second round 6-4 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 65
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 66
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 1987* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Mark Dickson | 6-4 4-6 6-4 | Todd Nelson | Match data |
| Aug 29, 1985* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Todd Nelson | 7-6 4-6 7-6 7-6 | Mark Dickson | Match data |
| Nov 16, 1984* | Treviso | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Todd Nelson | 6-3 6-4 | Mark Dickson | Match data |
| Oct 6, 1984* | Brisbane | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Mark Dickson | 6-4 2-6 6-2 | Todd Nelson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Todd Nelson | #1,179 | #58 | 156 | 1,650 | 53 | 90 | 37.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mark Dickson | #1,095 | #32 | 0 | 1,817 | 128 | 118 | 52.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Todd Nelson | Mark Dickson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1983 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #423 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #41 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1984 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #97 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #66 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1985 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #161 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 36–22 | 62.1% | #35 | 1,810 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1986 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #117 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,717 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1987 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #112 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #131 | 1,613 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1988 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #122 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #155 | 1,618 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #486 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #485 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #273 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1993 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #255 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |