H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Todd Nelson vs Pavel Slozil H2H: 0-3
Pavel Slozil holds a 3–0 lead over Todd Nelson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Pavel Slozil leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Pavel Slozil won the 1985 Philadelphia second round 7-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 65
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 70
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 1985* | Philadelphia | ATP 250 | R64 | Carpet | Pavel Slozil | 7-6 6-2 | Todd Nelson | Match data |
| Nov 22, 1984* | Toulouse | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Pavel Slozil | 6-4 6-7 6-3 | Todd Nelson | Match data |
| Jul 25, 1984* | Washington | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Pavel Slozil | 7-6 6-1 | Todd Nelson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Todd Nelson | #1,179 | #58 | 156 | 1,650 | 53 | 90 | 37.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Pavel Slozil | #550 | #12 | 0 | 1,790 | 142 | 160 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Todd Nelson | Pavel Slozil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #218 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #310 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,418 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1983 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #423 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1984 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #97 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #78 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1985 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #161 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1986 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #117 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #68 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1987 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #112 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #49 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1988 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #122 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #81 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #486 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #40 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #485 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #95 | 1,643 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #273 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,587 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1993 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #255 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |