H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Todd Witsken vs Andres Gomez H2H: 0-1

Andres Gomez holds a 1–0 lead over Todd Witsken in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andres Gomez leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andres Gomez won the 1986 Hong Kong Open round of 32 6-3 4-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Todd Witsken
USA Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Andres Gomez
ECU Age 66 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andres Gomez #13 6-3 4-6 6-4 Todd Witsken #53 Match data Oct 30, 1986* R32 Hong Kong Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Todd Witsken #1,205 #43 568 1,782 115 135 46.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Andres Gomez #1,171 #4 2,005 2,094 502 261 65.8% 1 0 0 3 17 21

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Todd Witsken Andres Gomez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,496 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1983 1–2 33.3% #358 1,496 0 0 1979 11–8 57.9% #61 1,639 0 0
20 1984 0–2 0.0% #676 1,481 0 0 1980 36–23 61.0% #42 1,802 0 0
21 1985 0–2 0.0% #220 1,462 0 0 1981 36–21 63.2% #37 1,901 0 1
22 1986 13–15 46.4% #55 1,650 0 0 1982 51–25 67.1% #15 1,887 0 3
23 1987 10–16 38.5% #158 1,627 0 0 1983 43–20 68.3% #14 1,960 0 4
24 1988 17–16 51.5% #67 1,692 0 0 1984 60–13 82.2% #5 2,074 0 9
25 1989 21–16 56.8% #54 1,716 0 0 1985 26–14 65.0% #15 1,971 0 10
26 1990 23–20 53.5% #58 1,772 0 0 1986 57–20 74.0% #10 1,898 0 14
27 1991 12–16 42.9% #110 1,678 0 0 1987 46–18 71.9% #11 1,913 0 15
28 1992 14–18 43.8% #104 1,637 0 0 1988 34–18 65.4% #24 1,808 0 15
29 1993 4–10 28.6% #275 1,554 0 0 1989 32–17 65.3% #17 1,869 0 17
30 — — — — — — — 1990 38–27 58.5% #6 1,719 1 20
31 — — — — — — — 1991 20–19 51.3% #70 1,720 1 21
32 — — — — — — — 1992 10–12 45.5% #179 1,675 1 21
33 — — — — — — — 1993 2–6 25.0% #402 1,606 1 21

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Todd Witsken Andres Gomez
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1983 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1979 1 1 2 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — —
20 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1980 2 2 4 50.0% 30 17 47 63.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 1985 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 32 16 48 66.7% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1986 11 8 19 57.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1982 3 2 5 60.0% 38 16 54 70.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5%
23 1987 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1983 16 6 22 72.7% 21 10 31 67.7% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0%
24 1988 14 13 27 51.9% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1984 11 3 14 78.6% 35 5 40 87.5% 4 1 5 80.0% 10 4 14 71.4%
25 1989 12 8 20 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 1985 11 3 14 78.6% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 7 5 12 58.3%
26 1990 15 10 25 60.0% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 1986 18 5 23 78.3% 34 9 43 79.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
27 1991 7 10 17 41.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 15 6 21 71.4% 23 8 31 74.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
28 1992 8 12 20 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1988 17 9 26 65.4% 15 6 21 71.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
29 1993 4 5 9 44.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1989 12 7 19 63.2% 18 8 26 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 10 10 20 50.0% 24 6 30 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 10 14 28.6%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 8 10 18 44.4% 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 6 1 7 85.7%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 2 3 5 40.0% 8 9 17 47.1% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
Career — 81 77 158 51.3% 17 31 48 35.4% 6 14 20 30.0% 11 13 24 45.8% — 130 72 202 64.4% 304 135 439 69.2% 10 8 18 55.6% 58 46 104 55.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Todd Witsken Andres Gomez
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1981 1496 98.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1982 1481 96.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1983 1497 107.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.83 — 2–0 — -0.42 1979 1640 133.9 — — — — — +23 — 53.3% +0.13 5–1 (83%) 6–1 (86%) — +0.20
20 1984 1482 99.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — -0.17 1980 1803 150.2 — — — — -218 +37 -239 56.6% +0.51 9–5 (64%) 7–5 (58%) — -1.09
21 1985 1463 102.9 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.40 0–1 0–1 — +0.11 1981 1902 159.2 — — — — -233 +53 — 61.4% +0.73 11–11 (50%) 14–9 (61%) — -2.54
22 1986 1651 139.5 — — — — +46 -167 -124 48.1% -0.24 6–6 (50%) 6–5 (55%) — -1.21 1982 1887 151.8 — — — — -96 +44 — 60.2% +0.59 18–10 (64%) 12–9 (57%) — -1.90
23 1987 1628 134.3 — — — — +50 -143 — 42.9% -0.46 1–5 (17%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.86 1983 1961 152.2 — — — — -52 +15 — 66.2% +0.91 8–8 (50%) 13–6 (68%) — -1.48
24 1988 1692 143.0 — — — — +22 -163 — 51.2% +0.15 5–4 (56%) 3–7 (30%) — -1.42 1984 2075 162.7 — — — — -57 +57 -408 74.2% +1.57 14–6 (70%) 28–8 (78%) — -0.36
25 1989 1717 135.0 — — — — +32 -154 -225 54.3% +0.25 7–4 (64%) 7–6 (54%) — +0.60 1985 1972 156.7 — — — — +24 +63 — 59.6% +0.84 8–6 (57%) 6–3 (67%) — -2.07
26 1990 1773 139.2 — — — — +47 -218 — 51.9% -0.33 7–7 (50%) 9–2 (82%) — -0.18 1986 1899 151.6 — — — — +57 +84 — 65.3% +0.96 19–3 (86%) 15–13 (54%) — +0.32
27 1991 1679 135.7 -1.92 -0.05 0.916 48.4% +47 -78 -140 42.7% -0.36 6–5 (55%) 2–6 (25%) — -1.73 1987 1914 153.2 — — — — +9 +79 -210 65.7% +0.91 13–5 (72%) 19–11 (63%) — -0.88
28 1992 1637 124.6 -1.67 +0.77 0.969 49.2% +16 +3 -110 44.9% -0.59 4–5 (44%) 7–3 (70%) — -0.58 1988 1808 143.7 — — — — -7 +174 — 59.9% +0.53 14–6 (70%) 13–4 (76%) — +0.08
29 1993 1554 114.5 -2.93 -2.69 0.785 45.7% +99 +12 — 36.8% -1.16 1–3 (25%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.36 1989 1869 146.8 — — — — -39 +112 — 60.4% +0.46 9–7 (56%) 13–12 (52%) — -1.82
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1719 152.3 — — — — -59 +350 — 56.2% +0.37 14–14 (50%) 22–13 (63%) — +1.72
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1720 132.4 +1.72 -0.14 1.075 51.3% -41 +210 — 52.1% +0.27 8–8 (50%) 6–5 (55%) — +1.82
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1676 124.1 +0.46 -0.28 0.968 49.8% -20 +116 — 50.0% +0.13 3–3 (50%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.39
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1607 107.6 -1.77 +0.32 0.915 48.6% — +122 — 38.1% -0.95 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) — +0.27
Career — 1782 140.8 -2.00 -0.18 0.914 48.2% +40 -116 -145 46.9% -0.33 37–40 (48%) 40–33 (55%) 103.8 -2.20 — 2094 156.6 +0.93 -0.14 1.018 50.5% -35 +90 -295 61.4% +0.71 154–97 (61%) 181–105 (63%) 109.8 -1.07

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.