H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Todd Witsken vs Jimmy Connors H2H: 1-4

Jimmy Connors holds a 4–1 lead over Todd Witsken in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Jimmy Connors leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jimmy Connors won the 1991 Roland Garros round of 128 6-3 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Todd Witsken
USA Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main-draw meetings
Jimmy Connors
USA Age 74 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jimmy Connors #324 6-3 6-3 7-5 Todd Witsken #67 Match data May 29, 1991* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Jimmy Connors #6 6-3 2-6 6-2 Todd Witsken #73 Match data Aug 1, 1987* QF Washington Open ATP 250 Hard
Jimmy Connors #8 6-7 6-2 2-1 (ret.) Todd Witsken #68 Match data Apr 2, 1987* R32 Chicago ATP 250 Carpet
Todd Witsken #84 6-2 6-4 7-5 Jimmy Connors #5 Match data Sep 1, 1986* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Jimmy Connors #4 6-3 6-0 Todd Witsken #125 Match data Mar 22, 1986* QF Fort Myers ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Todd Witsken #1,205 #43 568 1,782 115 135 46.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jimmy Connors #1,295 #1 875 2,441 1,266 298 80.9% 8 0 1 0 100 109

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Todd Witsken Jimmy Connors
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0
17 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,496 0 0 1970 5–4 55.6% — 1,557 0 0
18 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,481 0 0 1971 23–13 63.9% — 1,773 0 0
19 1983 1–2 33.3% #358 1,496 0 0 1972 76–25 75.2% — 1,995 0 6
20 1984 0–2 0.0% #676 1,481 0 0 1973 86–16 84.3% #3 2,156 0 17
21 1985 0–2 0.0% #220 1,462 0 0 1974 95–6 94.1% #1 2,327 3 32
22 1986 13–15 46.4% #55 1,650 0 0 1975 79–10 88.8% #1 2,299 3 41
23 1987 10–16 38.5% #158 1,627 0 0 1976 98–9 91.6% #1 2,386 4 53
24 1988 17–16 51.5% #67 1,692 0 0 1977 70–16 81.4% #1 2,342 4 61
25 1989 21–16 56.8% #54 1,716 0 0 1978 68–7 90.7% #1 2,385 5 71
26 1990 23–20 53.5% #58 1,772 0 0 1979 79–13 85.9% #2 2,309 5 79
27 1991 12–16 42.9% #110 1,678 0 0 1980 73–15 83.0% #3 2,208 5 85
28 1992 14–18 43.8% #104 1,637 0 0 1981 59–12 83.1% #2 2,169 5 89
29 1993 4–10 28.6% #275 1,554 0 0 1982 78–11 87.6% #2 2,282 7 96
30 — — — — — — — 1983 52–11 82.5% #3 2,200 8 100
31 — — — — — — — 1984 69–12 85.2% #2 2,242 8 105
32 — — — — — — — 1985 45–15 75.0% #4 2,155 8 105
33 — — — — — — — 1986 46–15 75.4% #8 2,015 8 105
34 — — — — — — — 1987 52–19 73.2% #4 1,987 8 105
35 — — — — — — — 1988 40–11 78.4% #7 2,036 8 107
36 — — — — — — — 1989 31–13 70.5% #14 1,962 8 109
37 — — — — — — — 1990 0–3 0.0% #936 1,885 8 109
38 — — — — — — — 1991 19–14 57.6% #49 1,889 8 109
39 — — — — — — — 1992 17–16 51.5% #84 1,784 8 109
40 — — — — — — — 1993 3–5 37.5% #370 1,724 8 109
41 — — — — — — — 1994 1–3 25.0% #672 1,687 8 109
42 — — — — — — — 1995 2–2 50.0% #419 1,678 8 109
43 — — — — — — — 1996 0–1 0.0% #1300 1,669 8 109

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Todd Witsken Jimmy Connors
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1970 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
18 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1971 19 7 26 73.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1983 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1972 25 8 33 75.8% 18 7 25 72.0% 10 3 13 76.9% 23 7 30 76.7%
20 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1973 46 3 49 93.9% 12 5 17 70.6% 13 4 17 76.5% 15 4 19 78.9%
21 1985 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1974 20 1 21 95.2% 9 2 11 81.8% 29 1 30 96.7% 37 2 39 94.9%
22 1986 11 8 19 57.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1975 15 1 16 93.8% 22 2 24 91.7% 14 3 17 82.4% 28 4 32 87.5%
23 1987 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1976 20 3 23 87.0% 29 3 32 90.6% 9 1 10 90.0% 40 2 42 95.2%
24 1988 14 13 27 51.9% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1977 16 2 18 88.9% 18 5 23 78.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 29 7 36 80.6%
25 1989 12 8 20 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 1978 18 1 19 94.7% 13 1 14 92.9% 12 1 13 92.3% 25 4 29 86.2%
26 1990 15 10 25 60.0% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 1979 33 3 36 91.7% 13 3 16 81.3% 5 1 6 83.3% 28 6 34 82.4%
27 1991 7 10 17 41.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1980 17 3 20 85.0% 18 6 24 75.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 33 5 38 86.8%
28 1992 8 12 20 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1981 22 4 26 84.6% 15 3 18 83.3% 5 1 6 83.3% 17 4 21 81.0%
29 1993 4 5 9 44.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1982 36 4 40 90.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 13 0 13 100.0% 22 5 27 81.5%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 25 5 30 83.3% 4 1 5 80.0% 9 1 10 90.0% 14 4 18 77.8%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 30 4 34 88.2% 8 2 10 80.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 21 4 25 84.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 18 6 24 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 14 5 19 73.7%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 25 7 32 78.1% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 16 6 22 72.7%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 33 10 43 76.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 5 6 11 45.5%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 29 7 36 80.6% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 6 2 8 75.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 25 6 31 80.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 13 7 20 65.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3%
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 15 11 26 57.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 81 77 158 51.3% 17 31 48 35.4% 6 14 20 30.0% 11 13 24 45.8% — 506 112 618 81.9% 210 61 271 77.5% 174 38 212 82.1% 376 87 463 81.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Todd Witsken Jimmy Connors
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1480 97.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.19
17 1981 1496 98.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.17 1970 1558 114.8 — — — — +95 — -49 50.0% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–3 (25%) 101.0 -0.24
18 1982 1481 96.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.16 1971 1773 125.8 — — — — +97 -248 — 59.6% +0.63 9–5 (64%) 7–9 (44%) 101.4 +2.95
19 1983 1497 107.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.83 — 2–0 — -0.42 1972 1996 147.3 — — — — +64 -226 -238 69.4% +1.26 18–15 (55%) 14–11 (56%) 102.1 +3.34
20 1984 1482 99.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — -0.17 1973 2156 156.4 — — — — +95 -299 -234 78.6% +2.04 14–9 (61%) 13–11 (54%) 98.3 0.00
21 1985 1463 102.9 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.40 0–1 0–1 — +0.11 1974 2327 156.3 — — — — +66 -370 -5 85.9% +2.48 15–3 (83%) 15–8 (65%) 104.4 +2.36
22 1986 1651 139.5 — — — — +46 -167 -124 48.1% -0.24 6–6 (50%) 6–5 (55%) 104.1 -1.21 1975 2299 164.9 — — — — +130 -149 -31 84.5% +2.56 12–2 (86%) 8–3 (73%) 104.2 -0.69
23 1987 1628 134.3 — — — — +50 -143 — 42.9% -0.46 1–5 (17%) 2–1 (67%) 96.0 -0.86 1976 2386 175.3 — — — — +105 -35 -92 87.1% +2.45 13–4 (76%) 20–6 (77%) 108.1 -2.86
24 1988 1692 143.0 — — — — +22 -163 — 51.2% +0.15 5–4 (56%) 3–7 (30%) 98.6 -1.42 1977 2343 176.2 — — — — +110 -49 -30 79.1% +2.09 12–5 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 99.0 -3.18
25 1989 1717 135.0 — — — — +32 -154 -225 54.3% +0.25 7–4 (64%) 7–6 (54%) 103.7 +0.60 1978 2385 171.9 — — — — +38 -56 -52 86.1% +2.37 10–3 (77%) 7–3 (70%) 101.5 -2.85
26 1990 1773 139.2 — — — — +47 -218 — 51.9% -0.33 7–7 (50%) 9–2 (82%) 106.5 -0.18 1979 2310 177.1 — — — — +78 +55 +47 77.6% +1.93 16–3 (84%) 12–8 (60%) 103.4 -4.08
27 1991 1679 135.7 -1.92 -0.05 0.916 48.4% +47 -78 -140 42.7% -0.36 6–5 (55%) 2–6 (25%) 99.4 -1.73 1980 2209 172.6 — — — — +167 -11 +152 78.2% +2.18 11–6 (65%) 16–12 (57%) 95.4 -2.66
28 1992 1637 124.6 -1.67 +0.77 0.969 49.2% +16 +3 -110 44.9% -0.59 4–5 (44%) 7–3 (70%) 101.7 -0.58 1981 2170 172.7 — — — — +131 +7 +149 76.1% +1.96 11–4 (73%) 10–8 (56%) 99.9 -3.29
29 1993 1554 114.5 -2.93 -2.69 0.785 45.7% +99 +12 — 36.8% -1.16 1–3 (25%) 2–2 (50%) 96.9 +0.36 1982 2282 171.6 — — — — +42 -144 +139 81.8% +2.33 11–2 (85%) 15–5 (75%) 105.8 -4.60
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 2200 169.8 — — — — +74 -86 +260 78.1% +2.05 6–2 (75%) 10–3 (77%) 102.9 -3.68
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 2243 172.5 — — — — +36 -114 +203 77.6% +1.88 14–6 (70%) 14–7 (67%) 101.2 -6.13
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 2155 161.7 — — — — +58 -25 +241 74.1% +1.48 6–3 (67%) 8–3 (73%) 99.0 -3.15
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 2015 156.9 — — — — +63 — +293 68.8% +1.35 15–5 (75%) 10–9 (53%) 96.2 -2.10
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1987 161.0 — — — — +39 +104 +276 67.2% +1.33 12–3 (80%) 10–11 (48%) 101.5 -1.55
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 2036 157.7 — — — — +53 — +97 76.9% +1.99 6–5 (55%) 6–8 (43%) 93.7 -0.10
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1963 149.7 — — — — +100 +14 — 66.4% +1.25 6–4 (60%) 3–5 (38%) 93.5 -0.14
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1886 104.1 — — — — +80 — — 14.3% -1.43 0–1 0–2 — -0.13
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1889 146.4 -1.80 +3.12 1.005 50.1% +29 +62 +178 57.1% +0.30 7–5 (58%) 7–4 (64%) 100.9 -2.82
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1785 141.4 -1.86 +2.27 0.962 49.5% +35 +121 — 51.8% +0.05 8–6 (57%) 6–4 (60%) 97.8 -2.16
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1724 107.2 -2.74 +0.29 0.890 47.1% +57 — — 37.5% -0.69 2–0 0–2 — -0.14
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1687 107.8 -2.12 +0.37 0.980 49.9% — — — 40.0% -0.30 0–2 0–1 — +0.01
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1678 102.2 -1.10 +0.01 0.912 49.1% — — +305 50.0% +0.25 — 2–1 (67%) — +0.27
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1669 100.0 +0.85 +1.29 0.725 44.1% — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.32
Career — 1782 140.8 -2.00 -0.18 0.914 48.2% +40 -116 -145 46.9% -0.33 37–40 (48%) 40–33 (55%) 103.8 -2.20 — 2442 169.4 -1.84 +2.23 0.967 49.5% +78 -89 +40 75.9% +1.82 236–106 (69%) 218–151 (59%) 99.9 -2.45

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.