H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Todd Witsken vs Kevin Curren H2H: 0-4
Kevin Curren holds a 4–0 lead over Todd Witsken in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Kevin Curren leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Kevin Curren won the 1992 Queen's Club second round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 68
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 1992* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R64 | Grass | Kevin Curren | 6-4 7-5 | Todd Witsken | Match data |
| Sep 2, 1990* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Kevin Curren | 6-4 6-3 6-3 | Todd Witsken | Match data |
| Sep 29, 1989* | San Francisco | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Kevin Curren | 6-4 3-6 6-1 | Todd Witsken | Match data |
| Oct 11, 1986* | Scottsdale | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Kevin Curren | 7-5 6-7 6-4 | Todd Witsken | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Todd Witsken | #1,205 | #43 | 568 | 1,780 | 115 | 135 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kevin Curren | #1,179 | #5 | 684 | 2,060 | 339 | 238 | 58.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Todd Witsken | Kevin Curren | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #358 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #676 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #91 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #55 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #55 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #158 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #50 | 1,770 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1988 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #67 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 33–17 | 66.0% | #17 | 1,941 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1989 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #54 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #9 | 1,925 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1990 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #58 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 32–17 | 65.3% | #15 | 1,932 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1991 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #110 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 25–13 | 65.8% | #10 | 1,895 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1992 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #104 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #18 | 1,886 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1993 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #275 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #37 | 1,807 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 31–15 | 67.4% | #23 | 1,822 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #20 | 1,793 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #71 | 1,791 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #58 | 1,700 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #147 | 1,653 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1178 | 1,631 | 0 | 5 |