H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Todd Witsken vs Martin Wostenholme H2H: 0-1
Martin Wostenholme holds a 1–0 lead over Todd Witsken in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Martin Wostenholme leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Martin Wostenholme won the 1990 Toronto Indoor second round 6-7 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 63
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 1990* | Toronto Indoor | ATP 250 | R64 | Carpet | Martin Wostenholme | 6-7 6-4 7-5 | Todd Witsken | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Todd Witsken | #1,205 | #43 | 568 | 1,780 | 115 | 135 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Martin Wostenholme | #1,171 | #84 | 265 | 1,607 | 44 | 79 | 35.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Todd Witsken | Martin Wostenholme | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #579 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #358 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #676 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #329 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #186 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #55 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #158 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #190 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #67 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #251 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1989 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #54 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #293 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1990 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #58 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1991 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #110 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #156 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1992 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #104 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #153 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1993 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #275 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |