H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Todd Witsken vs Paolo Cane H2H: 1-0
Todd Witsken holds a 1–0 lead over Paolo Cane in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Todd Witsken leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Todd Witsken won the 1988 Auckland third round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 1988* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Todd Witsken | 6-3 6-1 | Paolo Cane | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Todd Witsken | #1,205 | #43 | 568 | 1,780 | 115 | 135 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Paolo Cane | #1,381 | #26 | 565 | 1,835 | 121 | 122 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Todd Witsken | Paolo Cane | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #358 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #676 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #199 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #44 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1986 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #55 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #51 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1987 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #158 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #81 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1988 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #67 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 24–14 | 63.2% | #33 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1989 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #54 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #109 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1990 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #58 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #122 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1991 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #110 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #163 | 1,654 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1992 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #104 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,596 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1993 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #275 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #145 | 1,598 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #635 | 1,581 | 0 | 3 |