H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Todd Witsken vs Simon Youl H2H: 1-1
Todd Witsken and Simon Youl are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Simon Youl leads 1–0 on grass, while Todd Witsken leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Simon Youl won the 1992 Manchester fourth round 6-1 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 61
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 1992* | Manchester | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Simon Youl | 6-1 7-6(5) | Todd Witsken | Match data |
| Aug 4, 1988* | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Todd Witsken | 7-5 6-7 6-2 | Simon Youl | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Todd Witsken | #1,205 | #43 | 568 | 1,780 | 115 | 135 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Simon Youl | #1,263 | #80 | 474 | 1,704 | 91 | 140 | 39.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Todd Witsken | Simon Youl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #450 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #201 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #358 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #90 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #676 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #258 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #121 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #55 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #109 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #158 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #156 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1988 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #67 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #154 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1989 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #54 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #140 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1990 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #58 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #94 | 1,559 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1991 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #110 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #200 | 1,444 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1992 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #104 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #151 | 1,443 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1993 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #275 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |