H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
Todd Woodbridge vs A. Cherkasov H2H: 0-1
A. Cherkasov holds a 1–0 lead over Todd Woodbridge in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, A. Cherkasov leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, A. Cherkasov won the 1991 Cincinnati Masters second round 7-6(4) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 55
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 1991* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | A. Cherkasov | 7-6(4) 6-1 | Todd Woodbridge | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Todd Woodbridge | #1,151 | #19 | 1,575 | 1,857 | 237 | 229 | 50.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| A. Cherkasov | #1,174 | #13 | 1,320 | 1,897 | 170 | 198 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Todd Woodbridge | A. Cherkasov | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1988 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #213 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #82 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #50 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #21 | 1,877 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1991 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #77 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #21 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1992 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #54 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 29–29 | 50.0% | #32 | 1,711 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #109 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #37 | 1,753 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1994 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #90 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 8–27 | 22.9% | #172 | 1,554 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1995 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #33 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #184 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1996 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #36 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #133 | 1,463 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1997 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #26 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,485 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,714 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,462 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1999 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,601 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #217 | 1,483 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2000 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #187 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #198 | 1,452 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2001 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #207 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |