H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Todd Woodbridge vs Andres Gomez H2H: 1-0

Todd Woodbridge holds a 1–0 lead over Andres Gomez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Todd Woodbridge leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Todd Woodbridge won the 1991 Schenectady round of 16 6-7(4) 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Todd Woodbridge
AUS Age 55 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Andres Gomez
ECU Age 66 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Todd Woodbridge #57 6-7(4) 6-4 7-5 Andres Gomez #137 Match data Aug 23, 1991* R16 Schenectady ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Todd Woodbridge #1,151 #19 1,575 1,870 239 231 50.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Andres Gomez #1,171 #4 2,005 2,094 502 261 65.8% 1 0 0 3 17 21

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Todd Woodbridge Andres Gomez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1988 1–6 14.3% #213 1,453 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1989 6–6 50.0% #131 1,573 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1990 16–17 48.5% #50 1,704 0 0 1979 11–8 57.9% #61 1,639 0 0
20 1991 23–25 47.9% #77 1,703 0 0 1980 36–23 61.0% #42 1,802 0 0
21 1992 25–23 52.1% #54 1,675 0 0 1981 36–21 63.2% #37 1,901 0 1
22 1993 19–20 48.7% #109 1,665 0 0 1982 51–25 67.1% #15 1,887 0 3
23 1994 15–19 44.1% #90 1,662 0 0 1983 43–20 68.3% #14 1,960 0 4
24 1995 32–22 59.3% #33 1,811 0 1 1984 60–13 82.2% #5 2,074 0 9
25 1996 34–24 58.6% #36 1,754 0 1 1985 26–14 65.0% #15 1,971 0 10
26 1997 31–20 60.8% #26 1,801 0 2 1986 57–20 74.0% #10 1,898 0 14
27 1998 21–21 50.0% #65 1,716 0 2 1987 46–18 71.9% #11 1,913 0 15
28 1999 8–16 33.3% #197 1,602 0 2 1988 34–18 65.4% #24 1,808 0 15
29 2000 4–6 40.0% #187 1,588 0 2 1989 32–17 65.3% #17 1,869 0 17
30 2001 4–6 40.0% #207 1,597 0 2 1990 38–27 58.5% #6 1,719 1 20
31 — — — — — — — 1991 20–19 51.3% #70 1,720 1 21
32 — — — — — — — 1992 10–12 45.5% #179 1,675 1 21
33 — — — — — — — 1993 2–6 25.0% #402 1,606 1 21

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Todd Woodbridge Andres Gomez
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1988 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 14 10 24 58.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1979 1 1 2 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — —
20 1991 14 13 27 51.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 1980 2 2 4 50.0% 30 17 47 63.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 1992 17 13 30 56.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 32 16 48 66.7% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1993 14 13 27 51.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1982 3 2 5 60.0% 38 16 54 70.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5%
23 1994 6 9 15 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 1983 16 6 22 72.7% 21 10 31 67.7% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0%
24 1995 14 12 26 53.8% 6 3 9 66.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 1984 11 3 14 78.6% 35 5 40 87.5% 4 1 5 80.0% 10 4 14 71.4%
25 1996 20 13 33 60.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 4 5 9 44.4% 1985 11 3 14 78.6% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 7 5 12 58.3%
26 1997 22 12 34 64.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1986 18 5 23 78.3% 34 9 43 79.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
27 1998 10 10 20 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 1987 15 6 21 71.4% 23 8 31 74.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
28 1999 6 10 16 37.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1988 17 9 26 65.4% 15 6 21 71.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
29 2000 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1989 12 7 19 63.2% 18 8 26 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 2001 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1990 10 10 20 50.0% 24 6 30 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 10 14 28.6%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 8 10 18 44.4% 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 6 1 7 85.7%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 2 3 5 40.0% 8 9 17 47.1% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
Career — 146 131 277 52.7% 21 32 53 39.6% 43 31 74 58.1% 29 37 66 43.9% — 130 72 202 64.4% 304 135 439 69.2% 10 8 18 55.6% 58 46 104 55.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Todd Woodbridge Andres Gomez
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1988 1453 103.4 — — — — +59 — — 21.1% -1.53 — 0–1 — +0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 1573 126.2 — — — — +14 — — 44.1% -0.68 2–0 5–2 (71%) — -0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 1705 141.6 — — — — +26 -177 — 47.3% -0.16 8–7 (53%) 8–5 (62%) 106.3 -0.46 1979 1640 133.9 — — — — — +23 — 53.3% +0.13 5–1 (83%) 6–1 (86%) 109.8 +0.20
20 1991 1704 135.7 -0.60 +1.97 0.996 49.9% -11 -147 -95 48.4% -0.03 5–3 (63%) 9–8 (53%) 102.3 -0.95 1980 1803 150.2 — — — — -218 +37 -239 56.6% +0.51 9–5 (64%) 7–5 (58%) 105.2 -1.09
21 1992 1676 141.7 -0.77 +2.88 1.047 51.0% +48 -130 -62 49.2% +0.12 9–8 (53%) 11–13 (46%) 101.7 -0.18 1981 1902 159.2 — — — — -233 +53 — 61.4% +0.73 11–11 (50%) 14–9 (61%) 104.5 -2.54
22 1993 1665 133.1 -2.39 +1.69 0.971 49.6% +31 -91 -53 46.4% -0.11 8–6 (57%) 5–6 (45%) 99.9 -0.10 1982 1887 151.8 — — — — -96 +44 — 60.2% +0.59 18–10 (64%) 12–9 (57%) 104.8 -1.90
23 1994 1662 123.5 -1.35 -0.55 0.931 48.8% +6 -162 +27 46.2% -0.19 9–8 (53%) 8–10 (44%) 100.1 +1.36 1983 1961 152.2 — — — — -52 +15 — 66.2% +0.91 8–8 (50%) 13–6 (68%) 101.9 -1.48
24 1995 1811 136.8 +0.19 +0.89 0.983 49.6% -41 -183 -91 54.0% +0.06 6–6 (50%) 13–7 (65%) 104.8 -2.85 1984 2075 162.7 — — — — -57 +57 -408 74.2% +1.57 14–6 (70%) 28–8 (78%) 112.5 -0.36
25 1996 1754 142.3 -1.66 +2.21 0.980 49.9% +8 -93 +11 56.4% +0.32 7–4 (64%) 16–12 (57%) 105.8 +0.28 1985 1972 156.7 — — — — +24 +63 — 59.6% +0.84 8–6 (57%) 6–3 (67%) 100.0 -2.07
26 1997 1801 143.6 -0.92 +3.35 1.040 50.8% -19 -148 +69 58.1% +0.40 7–5 (58%) 12–9 (57%) 102.4 -0.11 1986 1899 151.6 — — — — +57 +84 — 65.3% +0.96 19–3 (86%) 15–13 (54%) 104.4 +0.32
27 1998 1717 136.8 -3.37 +1.99 0.923 48.5% +12 -51 +123 46.8% -0.22 12–2 (86%) 6–12 (33%) 100.6 -0.66 1987 1914 153.2 — — — — +9 +79 -210 65.7% +0.91 13–5 (72%) 19–11 (63%) 105.9 -0.88
28 1999 1603 123.7 -0.75 -0.98 0.870 47.8% +69 -37 +208 35.5% -0.95 4–4 (50%) 6–5 (55%) 100.5 +0.58 1988 1808 143.7 — — — — -7 +174 — 59.9% +0.53 14–6 (70%) 13–4 (76%) 107.9 +0.08
29 2000 1589 116.3 -2.34 +1.34 0.976 49.6% +38 — — 48.3% -0.24 0–3 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 95.9 -0.13 1989 1869 146.8 — — — — -39 +112 — 60.4% +0.46 9–7 (56%) 13–12 (52%) 97.9 -1.82
30 2001 1598 112.4 -2.79 +0.59 0.950 48.9% -17 — +231 43.3% -0.37 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.55 1990 1719 152.3 — — — — -59 +350 — 56.2% +0.37 14–14 (50%) 22–13 (63%) 98.8 +1.72
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1720 132.4 +1.72 -0.14 1.075 51.3% -41 +210 — 52.1% +0.27 8–8 (50%) 6–5 (55%) 97.3 +1.82
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1676 124.1 +0.46 -0.28 0.968 49.8% -20 +116 — 50.0% +0.13 3–3 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 94.6 -0.39
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1607 107.6 -1.77 +0.32 0.915 48.6% — +122 — 38.1% -0.95 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) 98.4 +0.27
Career — 1870 141.5 -1.32 +1.70 0.980 49.7% +10 -122 +24 49.1% -0.07 79–58 (58%) 102–93 (52%) 106.9 -0.57 — 2094 156.6 +0.93 -0.14 1.018 50.5% -35 +90 -295 61.4% +0.71 154–97 (61%) 181–105 (63%) 109.8 -1.07

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.