H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Todd Woodbridge vs Arnaud Boetsch H2H: 1-2
Arnaud Boetsch holds a 2–1 lead over Todd Woodbridge in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Arnaud Boetsch leads 2–0 on carpet, while Todd Woodbridge leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Arnaud Boetsch won the 1996 Paris Masters second round 7-5 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 55
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 57
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 1996* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Carpet | Arnaud Boetsch | 7-5 7-6(3) | Todd Woodbridge | Match data |
| Oct 25, 1995* | Essen Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Carpet | Arnaud Boetsch | 6-3 6-4 | Todd Woodbridge | Match data |
| May 27, 1992* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Todd Woodbridge | 4-6 5-7 7-6(3) 6-4 6-2 | Arnaud Boetsch | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Todd Woodbridge | #1,151 | #19 | 1,575 | 1,857 | 237 | 229 | 50.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Arnaud Boetsch | #1,323 | #12 | 1,611 | 1,915 | 217 | 196 | 52.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Todd Woodbridge | Arnaud Boetsch | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1988 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #213 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #435 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #50 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #275 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #77 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #54 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #176 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #109 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #54 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #90 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #27 | 1,874 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #33 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #20 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1996 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #36 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1997 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #26 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 45–33 | 57.7% | #14 | 1,887 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,714 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #33 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1999 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,601 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #106 | 1,644 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2000 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #187 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #305 | 1,579 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2001 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #207 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #580 | 1,574 | 0 | 3 |