H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Todd Woodbridge vs Carl Uwe Steeb H2H: 0-1
Carl Uwe Steeb holds a 1–0 lead over Todd Woodbridge in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Carl Uwe Steeb leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Carl Uwe Steeb won the 1989 Sydney Indoor third round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 55
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 58
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 1989* | Sydney Indoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Carl Uwe Steeb | 6-1 6-4 | Todd Woodbridge | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Todd Woodbridge | #1,151 | #19 | 1,575 | 1,857 | 237 | 229 | 50.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Carl Uwe Steeb | #1,355 | #14 | 1,095 | 1,920 | 189 | 190 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Todd Woodbridge | Carl Uwe Steeb | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1988 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #213 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #50 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #77 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #73 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #54 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 34–15 | 69.4% | #15 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #109 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1994 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #90 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1995 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #33 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #29 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1996 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #36 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #94 | 1,718 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1997 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #26 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #89 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,714 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #67 | 1,660 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1999 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,601 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #179 | 1,540 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2000 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #187 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2001 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #207 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |