H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Todd Woodbridge vs David Pate H2H: 0-1

David Pate holds a 1–0 lead over Todd Woodbridge in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, David Pate leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Pate won the 1991 Japan Open round of 64 1-6 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Todd Woodbridge
AUS Age 55 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
David Pate
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
David Pate #89 1-6 6-3 6-3 Todd Woodbridge #43 Match data Apr 10, 1991* R64 Japan Open ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Todd Woodbridge #1,151 #19 1,575 1,870 239 231 50.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2
David Pate #911 #18 441 1,875 181 168 51.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Todd Woodbridge David Pate
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1988 1–6 14.3% #213 1,453 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1989 6–6 50.0% #131 1,573 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1990 16–17 48.5% #50 1,704 0 0 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0
20 1991 23–25 47.9% #77 1,703 0 0 1982 2–5 28.6% — 1,484 0 0
21 1992 25–23 52.1% #54 1,675 0 0 1983 5–7 41.7% #203 1,529 0 0
22 1993 19–20 48.7% #109 1,665 0 0 1984 21–13 61.8% #30 1,743 0 1
23 1994 15–19 44.1% #90 1,662 0 0 1985 31–24 56.4% #26 1,742 0 1
24 1995 32–22 59.3% #33 1,811 0 1 1986 35–23 60.3% #30 1,788 0 1
25 1996 34–24 58.6% #36 1,754 0 1 1987 28–18 60.9% #18 1,750 0 2
26 1997 31–20 60.8% #26 1,801 0 2 1988 20–16 55.6% #47 1,715 0 2
27 1998 21–21 50.0% #65 1,716 0 2 1989 9–19 32.1% #157 1,656 0 2
28 1999 8–16 33.3% #197 1,602 0 2 1990 16–15 51.6% #94 1,657 0 2
29 2000 4–6 40.0% #187 1,588 0 2 1991 11–18 37.9% #160 1,596 0 2
30 2001 4–6 40.0% #207 1,597 0 2 1992 1–4 20.0% #396 1,573 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 1993 1–3 25.0% #514 1,548 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% #624 1,561 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 1995 0–1 0.0% #911 1,542 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Todd Woodbridge David Pate
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1988 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 14 10 24 58.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1991 14 13 27 51.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 1982 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 1992 17 13 30 56.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1983 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
22 1993 14 13 27 51.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1984 18 6 24 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1994 6 9 15 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 1985 15 11 26 57.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 7 8 15 46.7%
24 1995 14 12 26 53.8% 6 3 9 66.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 1986 20 11 31 64.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 8 19 57.9%
25 1996 20 13 33 60.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 4 5 9 44.4% 1987 18 10 28 64.3% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 5 5 10 50.0%
26 1997 22 12 34 64.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1988 16 11 27 59.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 1998 10 10 20 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 1989 6 14 20 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 1999 6 10 16 37.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1990 7 10 17 41.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0%
29 2000 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1991 6 10 16 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1%
30 2001 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1992 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 146 131 277 52.7% 21 32 53 39.6% 43 31 74 58.1% 29 37 66 43.9% — 113 98 211 53.6% 5 13 18 27.8% 31 26 57 54.4% 32 31 63 50.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Todd Woodbridge David Pate
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1988 1453 103.4 — — — — +59 — — 21.1% -1.53 — 0–1 — +0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 1573 126.2 — — — — +14 — — 44.1% -0.68 2–0 5–2 (71%) — -0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 1705 141.6 — — — — +26 -177 — 47.3% -0.16 8–7 (53%) 8–5 (62%) — -0.46 1981 1494 104.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.00 — 0–2 — -0.08
20 1991 1704 135.7 -0.60 +1.97 0.996 49.9% -11 -147 -95 48.4% -0.03 5–3 (63%) 9–8 (53%) — -0.95 1982 1485 108.5 — — — — +40 — — 31.6% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — +0.29
21 1992 1676 141.7 -0.77 +2.88 1.047 51.0% +48 -130 -62 49.2% +0.12 9–8 (53%) 11–13 (46%) — -0.18 1983 1529 119.4 — — — — +10 — +62 37.9% -0.24 2–1 (67%) 2–8 (20%) — +0.28
22 1993 1665 133.1 -2.39 +1.69 0.971 49.6% +31 -91 -53 46.4% -0.11 8–6 (57%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.10 1984 1744 140.4 — — — — +36 -218 -186 59.5% +0.43 3–5 (38%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.33
23 1994 1662 123.5 -1.35 -0.55 0.931 48.8% +6 -162 +27 46.2% -0.19 9–8 (53%) 8–10 (44%) — +1.36 1985 1743 138.8 — — — — +29 -206 -84 52.4% +0.13 17–9 (65%) 15–13 (54%) — +0.85
24 1995 1811 136.8 +0.19 +0.89 0.983 49.6% -41 -183 -91 54.0% +0.06 6–6 (50%) 13–7 (65%) — -2.85 1986 1788 146.3 — — — — +34 — -115 58.3% +0.59 8–7 (53%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.85
25 1996 1754 142.3 -1.66 +2.21 0.980 49.9% +8 -93 +11 56.4% +0.32 7–4 (64%) 16–12 (57%) — +0.28 1987 1751 141.1 — — — — +30 — -55 61.5% +0.54 6–11 (35%) 18–11 (62%) — -0.04
26 1997 1801 143.6 -0.92 +3.35 1.040 50.8% -19 -148 +69 58.1% +0.40 7–5 (58%) 12–9 (57%) — -0.11 1988 1716 139.3 — — — — +41 — -25 52.7% +0.32 7–5 (58%) 7–11 (39%) — -1.56
27 1998 1717 136.8 -3.37 +1.99 0.923 48.5% +12 -51 +123 46.8% -0.22 12–2 (86%) 6–12 (33%) — -0.66 1989 1656 135.9 — — — — +19 — +63 35.5% -1.12 5–5 (50%) 5–8 (38%) — -2.42
28 1999 1603 123.7 -0.75 -0.98 0.870 47.8% +69 -37 +208 35.5% -0.95 4–4 (50%) 6–5 (55%) — +0.58 1990 1658 127.8 — — — — -22 — +129 50.6% +0.33 6–5 (55%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.85
29 2000 1589 116.3 -2.34 +1.34 0.976 49.6% +38 — — 48.3% -0.24 0–3 (0%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.13 1991 1596 133.2 — — — — +31 -112 +179 40.3% -0.61 5–6 (45%) 3–7 (30%) — -0.86
30 2001 1598 112.4 -2.79 +0.59 0.950 48.9% -17 — +231 43.3% -0.37 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.55 1992 1574 104.4 — — — — +24 — — 28.6% -1.57 1–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.43
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1548 104.3 — — — — +35 — — 33.3% -0.78 0–1 0–2 — +0.22
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1561 100.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -2.20 1–0 — — -0.12
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1542 99.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.14
Career — 1870 141.5 -1.32 +1.70 0.980 49.7% +10 -122 +24 49.1% -0.07 79–58 (58%) 102–93 (52%) 106.9 -0.57 — 1875 143.1 — — — — +27 -183 -21 50.8% +0.06 62–57 (52%) 73–84 (46%) 98.7 -0.49

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.