H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Todd Woodbridge vs David Prinosil H2H: 0-1

David Prinosil holds a 1–0 lead over Todd Woodbridge in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, David Prinosil leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, David Prinosil won the 1995 Newport quarterfinal 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Todd Woodbridge
AUS Age 55 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
David Prinosil
GER Age 53 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
David Prinosil #92 6-4 6-2 Todd Woodbridge #46 Match data Jul 15, 1995* QF Newport ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Todd Woodbridge #1,151 #19 1,575 1,870 239 231 50.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2
David Prinosil #1,091 #28 1,040 1,793 165 210 44.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Todd Woodbridge David Prinosil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1988 1–6 14.3% #213 1,453 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1989 6–6 50.0% #131 1,573 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1990 16–17 48.5% #50 1,704 0 0 1992 9–9 50.0% #125 1,583 0 0
20 1991 23–25 47.9% #77 1,703 0 0 1993 16–25 39.0% #77 1,634 0 0
21 1992 25–23 52.1% #54 1,675 0 0 1994 8–13 38.1% #130 1,632 0 0
22 1993 19–20 48.7% #109 1,665 0 0 1995 19–18 51.4% #50 1,708 0 1
23 1994 15–19 44.1% #90 1,662 0 0 1996 24–24 50.0% #39 1,771 0 2
24 1995 32–22 59.3% #33 1,811 0 1 1997 16–26 38.1% #89 1,630 0 2
25 1996 34–24 58.6% #36 1,754 0 1 1998 20–25 44.4% #78 1,621 0 2
26 1997 31–20 60.8% #26 1,801 0 2 1999 22–23 48.9% #66 1,671 0 2
27 1998 21–21 50.0% #65 1,716 0 2 2000 22–18 55.0% #38 1,779 0 3
28 1999 8–16 33.3% #197 1,602 0 2 2001 7–22 24.1% #132 1,604 0 3
29 2000 4–6 40.0% #187 1,588 0 2 2002 2–2 50.0% #229 1,591 0 3
30 2001 4–6 40.0% #207 1,597 0 2 2003 0–4 0.0% #276 1,520 0 3
31 — — — — — — — 2004 0–1 0.0% #1063 1,514 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Todd Woodbridge David Prinosil
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1988 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 14 10 24 58.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1992 — — — — 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
20 1991 14 13 27 51.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 1993 9 12 21 42.9% 1 7 8 12.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
21 1992 17 13 30 56.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 4 6 33.3%
22 1993 14 13 27 51.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1995 9 9 18 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9%
23 1994 6 9 15 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 1996 13 11 24 54.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 11 7 18 61.1%
24 1995 14 12 26 53.8% 6 3 9 66.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 1997 5 10 15 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 11 22 50.0%
25 1996 20 13 33 60.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 4 5 9 44.4% 1998 9 11 20 45.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 7 13 46.2%
26 1997 22 12 34 64.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1999 7 10 17 41.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
27 1998 10 10 20 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 2000 6 11 17 35.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 7 2 9 77.8%
28 1999 6 10 16 37.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2001 4 14 18 22.2% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2000 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2002 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
30 2001 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2003 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 146 131 277 52.7% 21 32 53 39.6% 43 31 74 58.1% 29 37 66 43.9% — 63 94 157 40.1% 13 40 53 24.5% 35 26 61 57.4% 54 50 104 51.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 360/418 of Todd Woodbridge's and 337/375 of David Prinosil's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Todd Woodbridge David Prinosil
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 16/18 4.7 5.1 51.2% 68.4% 46.2% 58.7% 43.7% 57.9% 39.8%
20 1991 37/48 2.0 3.4 59.8% 67.3% 50.1% 57.0% 43.8% 60.2% 39.6% 1993 38/41 5.7 5.8 48.0% 70.6% 46.8% 53.3% 40.1% 58.2% 38.8%
21 1992 44/48 2.7 4.8 60.3% 69.2% 48.5% 59.9% 40.7% 60.9% 40.9% 1994 18/21 8.6 7.1 44.8% 77.2% 45.0% 65.0% 33.6% 59.6% 35.1%
22 1993 33/39 2.4 4.5 60.5% 67.2% 47.6% 51.3% 41.8% 59.2% 39.6% 1995 37/37 8.6 5.5 50.5% 78.2% 48.5% 63.9% 44.6% 63.5% 38.1%
23 1994 30/34 3.4 4.9 59.1% 70.6% 45.0% 55.4% 47.1% 60.1% 37.2% 1996 43/48 7.3 4.0 53.1% 75.6% 49.1% 64.9% 39.1% 62.9% 37.6%
24 1995 50/54 2.7 4.6 57.9% 70.2% 48.3% 60.0% 42.9% 61.3% 38.1% 1997 38/42 6.6 3.8 50.7% 72.9% 47.9% 58.1% 42.5% 60.3% 36.0%
25 1996 51/58 3.3 5.3 56.7% 69.0% 48.1% 55.8% 42.8% 60.0% 39.2% 1998 39/45 8.6 5.4 50.7% 78.2% 47.8% 51.6% 43.1% 63.0% 35.7%
26 1997 42/51 3.6 4.0 58.4% 70.3% 46.0% 60.1% 45.6% 60.2% 41.4% 1999 40/45 7.2 4.4 50.7% 76.0% 50.4% 53.9% 37.6% 63.3% 36.1%
27 1998 36/42 3.3 4.4 59.1% 64.4% 45.6% 54.0% 46.9% 56.8% 39.9% 2000 33/40 9.1 5.4 52.5% 75.0% 46.4% 65.6% 39.4% 61.4% 35.4%
28 1999 17/24 3.7 4.1 62.5% 66.7% 47.9% 51.7% 49.4% 60.0% 34.8% 2001 26/29 5.4 4.2 52.8% 69.9% 45.7% 55.7% 37.5% 58.2% 33.3%
29 2000 10/10 2.3 4.2 60.2% 66.6% 49.1% 57.1% 52.0% 59.7% 39.4% 2002 4/4 6.3 7.3 50.9% 73.7% 45.0% 63.6% 37.2% 58.9% 39.1%
30 2001 10/10 4.2 5.5 59.8% 66.1% 46.9% 59.1% 33.6% 58.5% 39.4% 2003 4/4 3.8 6.0 58.0% 63.5% 39.4% 37.7% 13.3% 52.7% 32.3%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 1/1 1.0 7.0 54.0% 67.6% 41.4% 62.5% — 55.6% 27.8%
Career — 360/470 3.0 4.5 59.1% 68.4% 47.6% 56.8% 44.0% 59.9% 39.3% — 337/375 7.2 5.0 50.8% 74.4% 47.6% 58.6% 39.9% 61.1% 36.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Todd Woodbridge David Prinosil
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1988 1453 103.4 — — — — +59 — — 21.1% -1.53 — 0–1 — +0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 1573 126.2 — — — — +14 — — 44.1% -0.68 2–0 5–2 (71%) — -0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 1705 141.6 — — — — +26 -177 — 47.3% -0.16 8–7 (53%) 8–5 (62%) 106.3 -0.46 1992 1584 124.3 -0.94 -0.69 0.944 49.1% -10 +20 — 48.9% -0.08 3–3 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 101.7 +1.25
20 1991 1704 135.7 -0.60 +1.97 0.996 49.9% -11 -147 -95 48.4% -0.03 5–3 (63%) 9–8 (53%) 102.3 -0.95 1993 1634 137.4 -2.68 +0.92 0.927 48.1% +22 -94 — 43.4% -0.56 5–9 (36%) 9–7 (56%) 101.8 -2.64
21 1992 1676 141.7 -0.77 +2.88 1.047 51.0% +48 -130 -62 49.2% +0.12 9–8 (53%) 11–13 (46%) 101.7 -0.18 1994 1632 123.0 -2.23 -1.70 0.869 47.6% -33 -99 +66 42.4% -0.56 2–4 (33%) 6–3 (67%) 102.6 +0.54
22 1993 1665 133.1 -2.39 +1.69 0.971 49.6% +31 -91 -53 46.4% -0.11 8–6 (57%) 5–6 (45%) 99.9 -0.10 1995 1709 138.9 +1.36 +0.40 1.046 51.0% -36 -165 +54 53.1% +0.14 5–9 (36%) 8–9 (47%) 99.6 -0.15
23 1994 1662 123.5 -1.35 -0.55 0.931 48.8% +6 -162 +27 46.2% -0.19 9–8 (53%) 8–10 (44%) 100.1 +1.36 1996 1772 147.8 +0.83 +0.78 1.014 50.5% +51 -272 -46 49.6% +0.12 7–8 (47%) 10–14 (42%) 97.4 -1.73
24 1995 1811 136.8 +0.19 +0.89 0.983 49.6% -41 -183 -91 54.0% +0.06 6–6 (50%) 13–7 (65%) 104.8 -2.85 1997 1631 131.8 -1.59 -0.14 0.905 48.5% +42 -157 — 38.4% -0.59 8–6 (57%) 6–10 (38%) 98.9 -1.03
25 1996 1754 142.3 -1.66 +2.21 0.980 49.9% +8 -93 +11 56.4% +0.32 7–4 (64%) 16–12 (57%) 105.8 +0.28 1998 1621 133.9 +0.75 -1.34 0.965 49.3% +12 -164 +85 44.9% -0.22 8–7 (53%) 12–13 (48%) 102.2 -0.31
26 1997 1801 143.6 -0.92 +3.35 1.040 50.8% -19 -148 +69 58.1% +0.40 7–5 (58%) 12–9 (57%) 102.4 -0.11 1999 1672 136.8 +0.80 -0.84 0.982 49.5% -9 -161 +2 47.7% +0.08 6–4 (60%) 6–8 (43%) 102.8 +0.22
27 1998 1717 136.8 -3.37 +1.99 0.923 48.5% +12 -51 +123 46.8% -0.22 12–2 (86%) 6–12 (33%) 100.6 -0.66 2000 1779 133.7 -0.50 -1.27 0.918 48.9% -59 -310 +78 50.5% -0.12 11–4 (73%) 11–5 (69%) 112.7 +0.01
28 1999 1603 123.7 -0.75 -0.98 0.870 47.8% +69 -37 +208 35.5% -0.95 4–4 (50%) 6–5 (55%) 100.5 +0.58 2001 1604 127.5 -3.03 -1.45 0.797 45.9% +13 -202 +186 30.7% -0.91 3–3 (50%) 3–9 (25%) 95.0 -1.97
29 2000 1589 116.3 -2.34 +1.34 0.976 49.6% +38 — — 48.3% -0.24 0–3 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 95.9 -0.13 2002 1592 102.9 -1.30 +0.60 0.952 48.7% — — — 44.4% -0.33 1–0 1–1 — -0.15
30 2001 1598 112.4 -2.79 +0.59 0.950 48.9% -17 — +231 43.3% -0.37 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.55 2003 1520 96.3 -4.05 -0.39 0.683 42.6% +61 — — 10.0% -2.70 — 0–2 — -0.16
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1515 99.3 -2.03 +1.03 0.625 42.7% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.15
Career — 1870 141.5 -1.32 +1.70 0.980 49.7% +10 -122 +24 49.1% -0.07 79–58 (58%) 102–93 (52%) 106.9 -0.57 — 1793 139.5 -0.56 -0.38 0.939 48.9% +8 -123 +64 44.9% -0.27 59–57 (51%) 75–85 (47%) 104.2 -1.67

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.