H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Todd Woodbridge vs Dick Norman H2H: 0-1
Dick Norman holds a 1–0 lead over Todd Woodbridge in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dick Norman leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Dick Norman won the 1995 Wimbledon third round 6-4 6-4 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 55
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 55
Left-Handed
203 cm / 6'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 1995* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Dick Norman | 6-4 6-4 3-6 6-3 | Todd Woodbridge | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Todd Woodbridge | #1,151 | #19 | 1,575 | 1,857 | 237 | 229 | 50.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Dick Norman | #882 | #85 | 456 | 1,629 | 27 | 66 | 29.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Todd Woodbridge | Dick Norman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1988 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #213 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #50 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1991 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #77 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1992 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #54 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #501 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #109 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #377 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #90 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1995 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #33 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #115 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #36 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #237 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #26 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #116 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,714 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #569 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1999 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,601 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2000 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #187 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2001 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #207 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #96 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #127 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #166 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #108 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #121 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #157 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #304 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |