H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Todd Woodbridge vs Diego Nargiso H2H: 1-0

Todd Woodbridge holds a 1–0 lead over Diego Nargiso in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Todd Woodbridge leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Todd Woodbridge won the 1992 New Haven round of 64 6-3 7-6(9).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Todd Woodbridge
AUS Age 55 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Diego Nargiso
ITA Age 56 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Todd Woodbridge #45 6-3 7-6(9) Diego Nargiso #102 Match data Aug 19, 1992* R64 New Haven ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Todd Woodbridge #1,151 #19 1,575 1,870 239 231 50.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Diego Nargiso #1,400 #67 531 1,702 95 153 38.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Todd Woodbridge Diego Nargiso
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1988 1–6 14.3% #213 1,453 0 0 1987 1–2 33.3% #191 1,511 0 0
18 1989 6–6 50.0% #131 1,573 0 0 1988 11–13 45.8% #90 1,626 0 0
19 1990 16–17 48.5% #50 1,704 0 0 1989 11–19 36.7% #150 1,593 0 0
20 1991 23–25 47.9% #77 1,703 0 0 1990 4–6 40.0% #147 1,620 0 0
21 1992 25–23 52.1% #54 1,675 0 0 1991 9–14 39.1% #109 1,604 0 0
22 1993 19–20 48.7% #109 1,665 0 0 1992 19–22 46.3% #88 1,597 0 0
23 1994 15–19 44.1% #90 1,662 0 0 1993 8–23 25.8% #120 1,526 0 0
24 1995 32–22 59.3% #33 1,811 0 1 1994 10–18 35.7% #118 1,531 0 0
25 1996 34–24 58.6% #36 1,754 0 1 1995 5–10 33.3% #183 1,530 0 0
26 1997 31–20 60.8% #26 1,801 0 2 1996 2–8 20.0% #280 1,507 0 0
27 1998 21–21 50.0% #65 1,716 0 2 1997 2–3 40.0% #152 1,546 0 0
28 1999 8–16 33.3% #197 1,602 0 2 1998 4–6 40.0% #128 1,563 0 0
29 2000 4–6 40.0% #187 1,588 0 2 1999 1–5 16.7% #220 1,523 0 0
30 2001 4–6 40.0% #207 1,597 0 2 2000 8–4 66.7% #134 1,625 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Todd Woodbridge Diego Nargiso
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1988 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1987 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
18 1989 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1988 8 7 15 53.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
19 1990 14 10 24 58.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1989 4 7 11 36.4% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0%
20 1991 14 13 27 51.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
21 1992 17 13 30 56.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1991 1 3 4 25.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1993 14 13 27 51.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1992 10 9 19 52.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
23 1994 6 9 15 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 1993 4 9 13 30.8% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
24 1995 14 12 26 53.8% 6 3 9 66.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 1994 1 4 5 20.0% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0%
25 1996 20 13 33 60.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 4 5 9 44.4% 1995 1 2 3 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
26 1997 22 12 34 64.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1996 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1998 10 10 20 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 1997 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
28 1999 6 10 16 37.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1998 2 1 3 66.7% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
29 2000 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1999 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2001 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2000 1 2 3 33.3% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — —
Career — 146 131 277 52.7% 21 32 53 39.6% 43 31 74 58.1% 29 37 66 43.9% — 33 47 80 41.2% 30 64 94 31.9% 11 15 26 42.3% 21 27 48 43.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 360/418 of Todd Woodbridge's and 164/181 of Diego Nargiso's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Todd Woodbridge Diego Nargiso
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 1991 37/48 2.0 3.4 59.8% 67.3% 50.1% 57.0% 43.8% 60.2% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1992 44/48 2.7 4.8 60.3% 69.2% 48.5% 59.9% 40.7% 60.9% 40.9% 1991 22/23 6.7 5.4 55.7% 74.1% 51.5% 62.6% 37.2% 63.8% 35.6%
22 1993 33/39 2.4 4.5 60.5% 67.2% 47.6% 51.3% 41.8% 59.2% 39.6% 1992 38/41 6.9 4.9 53.9% 75.4% 48.2% 63.7% 48.5% 62.7% 36.2%
23 1994 30/34 3.4 4.9 59.1% 70.6% 45.0% 55.4% 47.1% 60.1% 37.2% 1993 27/31 6.1 4.0 54.0% 72.0% 45.3% 55.7% 36.1% 59.7% 35.7%
24 1995 50/54 2.7 4.6 57.9% 70.2% 48.3% 60.0% 42.9% 61.3% 38.1% 1994 27/28 5.6 5.5 50.7% 69.4% 45.3% 51.7% 46.5% 57.6% 38.8%
25 1996 51/58 3.3 5.3 56.7% 69.0% 48.1% 55.8% 42.8% 60.0% 39.2% 1995 13/15 6.8 6.1 50.9% 72.5% 46.3% 53.1% 49.4% 59.5% 36.3%
26 1997 42/51 3.6 4.0 58.4% 70.3% 46.0% 60.1% 45.6% 60.2% 41.4% 1996 9/10 5.1 7.7 54.5% 68.2% 39.5% 61.9% 36.7% 54.8% 36.1%
27 1998 36/42 3.3 4.4 59.1% 64.4% 45.6% 54.0% 46.9% 56.8% 39.9% 1997 4/5 4.8 3.3 54.8% 72.6% 44.6% 72.0% 22.2% 59.9% 29.6%
28 1999 17/24 3.7 4.1 62.5% 66.7% 47.9% 51.7% 49.4% 60.0% 34.8% 1998 9/10 5.6 3.1 54.8% 73.0% 49.4% 43.9% 47.4% 62.7% 38.4%
29 2000 10/10 2.3 4.2 60.2% 66.6% 49.1% 57.1% 52.0% 59.7% 39.4% 1999 5/6 4.6 3.0 58.5% 63.4% 43.0% 64.9% 31.7% 54.6% 30.8%
30 2001 10/10 4.2 5.5 59.8% 66.1% 46.9% 59.1% 33.6% 58.5% 39.4% 2000 10/12 6.5 4.0 55.1% 79.1% 48.5% 44.7% 51.7% 65.2% 38.7%
Career — 360/470 3.0 4.5 59.1% 68.4% 47.6% 56.8% 44.0% 59.9% 39.3% — 164/248 6.2 4.9 53.7% 72.7% 46.9% 57.3% 43.0% 60.7% 36.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Todd Woodbridge Diego Nargiso
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1988 1453 103.4 — — — — +59 — — 21.1% -1.53 — 0–1 — +0.38 1987 1511 117.3 — — — — — +35 — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — -0.22
18 1989 1573 126.2 — — — — +14 — — 44.1% -0.68 2–0 5–2 (71%) — -0.39 1988 1627 124.8 — — — — -27 -80 -33 46.9% -0.81 2–5 (29%) 11–1 (92%) 106.6 +0.18
19 1990 1705 141.6 — — — — +26 -177 — 47.3% -0.16 8–7 (53%) 8–5 (62%) 106.3 -0.46 1989 1593 128.6 — — — — -51 +6 -10 40.5% -0.61 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 100.5 -1.78
20 1991 1704 135.7 -0.60 +1.97 0.996 49.9% -11 -147 -95 48.4% -0.03 5–3 (63%) 9–8 (53%) 102.3 -0.95 1990 1621 133.5 — — — — -33 -6 — 37.5% -0.67 2–0 3–3 (50%) — -0.55
21 1992 1676 141.7 -0.77 +2.88 1.047 51.0% +48 -130 -62 49.2% +0.12 9–8 (53%) 11–13 (46%) 101.7 -0.18 1991 1604 129.0 +1.95 -2.04 0.984 49.3% -51 +20 +36 45.6% -0.21 1–6 (14%) 9–10 (47%) 95.1 -0.69
22 1993 1665 133.1 -2.39 +1.69 0.971 49.6% +31 -91 -53 46.4% -0.11 8–6 (57%) 5–6 (45%) 99.9 -0.10 1992 1597 130.3 +1.50 -1.75 0.972 49.7% +42 -3 +10 51.9% -0.02 4–12 (25%) 9–7 (56%) 94.6 +2.22
23 1994 1662 123.5 -1.35 -0.55 0.931 48.8% +6 -162 +27 46.2% -0.19 9–8 (53%) 8–10 (44%) 100.1 +1.36 1993 1526 127.3 -0.86 -2.64 0.886 47.7% +68 +4 — 33.3% -0.83 2–6 (25%) 6–13 (32%) 94.7 -0.26
24 1995 1811 136.8 +0.19 +0.89 0.983 49.6% -41 -183 -91 54.0% +0.06 6–6 (50%) 13–7 (65%) 104.8 -2.85 1994 1532 129.5 -2.33 -0.45 0.916 48.2% +95 -56 +44 38.9% -0.65 5–7 (42%) 5–5 (50%) 101.5 +0.26
25 1996 1754 142.3 -1.66 +2.21 0.980 49.9% +8 -93 +11 56.4% +0.32 7–4 (64%) 16–12 (57%) 105.8 +0.28 1995 1530 121.5 -1.52 -1.31 0.895 48.0% +72 -44 +59 38.9% -0.47 0–3 (0%) 3–5 (38%) 96.1 +0.11
26 1997 1801 143.6 -0.92 +3.35 1.040 50.8% -19 -148 +69 58.1% +0.40 7–5 (58%) 12–9 (57%) 102.4 -0.11 1996 1508 114.3 -4.18 -0.49 0.799 46.0% +85 -38 — 32.3% -1.42 2–4 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 98.9 -0.08
27 1998 1717 136.8 -3.37 +1.99 0.923 48.5% +12 -51 +123 46.8% -0.22 12–2 (86%) 6–12 (33%) 100.6 -0.66 1997 1547 124.6 +0.07 -0.53 0.739 45.4% +84 — — 33.3% -0.75 2–0 1–1 — -0.59
28 1999 1603 123.7 -0.75 -0.98 0.870 47.8% +69 -37 +208 35.5% -0.95 4–4 (50%) 6–5 (55%) 100.5 +0.58 1998 1564 120.6 +0.37 -0.45 1.029 50.3% +93 -104 — 50.0% -0.33 0–4 (0%) 0–1 — +0.18
29 2000 1589 116.3 -2.34 +1.34 0.976 49.6% +38 — — 48.3% -0.24 0–3 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 95.9 -0.13 1999 1524 107.2 -1.01 -2.74 0.678 43.7% — -79 — 23.1% -1.54 0–1 0–3 (0%) — 0.00
30 2001 1598 112.4 -2.79 +0.59 0.950 48.9% -17 — +231 43.3% -0.37 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.55 2000 1625 118.8 +1.47 -0.06 1.112 51.4% +19 -21 — 68.0% +0.72 4–1 (80%) 3–2 (60%) 106.9 +0.50
Career — 1870 141.5 -1.32 +1.70 0.980 49.7% +10 -122 +24 49.1% -0.07 79–58 (58%) 102–93 (52%) 106.9 -0.57 — 1703 135.7 -0.19 -1.44 0.926 48.6% +29 -23 +20 42.9% -0.51 30–56 (35%) 58–60 (49%) 97.6 -0.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.