H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 19:16 UTC
Todd Woodbridge vs Hyung-Taik Lee H2H: 1-0
Todd Woodbridge holds a 1–0 lead over Hyung-Taik Lee in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Todd Woodbridge leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Todd Woodbridge won the 1999 Shanghai fourth round 5-7 6-2 7-6(8).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 55
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
KOR
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 1999* | Shanghai | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Todd Woodbridge | 5-7 6-2 7-6(8) | Hyung-Taik Lee | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Todd Woodbridge | #1,151 | #19 | 1,575 | 1,857 | 237 | 229 | 50.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Hyung-Taik Lee | #1,256 | #36 | 864 | 1,798 | 120 | 153 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Todd Woodbridge | Hyung-Taik Lee | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1988 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #213 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #50 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #77 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #54 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #116 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #109 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #87 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #90 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #56 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 1995 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #33 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #36 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #107 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #26 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #49 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,714 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #51 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,601 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #107 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 2000 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #187 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #871 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 2001 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #207 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |